|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ ENGLISH LAD ” |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
| · Page 1 · Found: 27 user comments posted recently. |
|  |
|
|
 7/9/19 2:45 PM |
| English Lad | |  |  |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Humbled wrote:
Most of what has been posted on here day after day is nothing more than a feeding of the flesh. I, in times past partook in these endless debates thinking I was doing God’s service for His Glory.Praise Him that he chastised this poor dumb sheep sorely, and showed me my sin.I kiss the hand that bore the rod.
**
Stated nicely, US. Is contending for truth “feeding of the flesh”?! |
|
|
| 7/6/19 3:51 PM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Good morning brother, and I wish you a happy breakfast. Did you say you were making breakfast? 
I made a mistake earlier today, which you just reminded me of. I completely forgot to include "English Lad". Sorry, lad. But you also are included in my ignore list, and if I see your moniker I shall not be reading anything you have to say. It's a free country, you can continue posting if you wish, but I shall not be reading any of your posts. But don't forget, English Lad, God loves you and has a specific plan for your life. Why not just get on with it? The heretic is getting bolder because his arminian cohorts come to his support. The day will reveal how little the Lord has blessed his labours despite his haughty claims to a superior spirituality; how little his false gospel has achieved. My guess is that he cannot even claim one convert for all his blathering all these years lying to people that God loves them and died for them specifically. |
|
|
| 7/5/19 11:10 AM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Adriel wrote:
I think those who claim J. C. Ryle was an Amyraldian are wrong No one said that Ryle was an Amyraldian. He was a confused English churchman of the better sort. However, Alan Clifford whom John quoted certainly is one. |
|
|
| 7/4/19 6:28 PM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
From an excellent article by Dr Alan C Clifford on the Norwich Reformed Church website, entitled "Ryle on Redemption - The Gospel According to John Charles Ryle"
Charenton Reformed Publishing
First published in Great Britain 2013
All rights reserved
ISBN 978-0-9555165-7-3
I like 'Bible-based'.  Quoting a known Amyraldian with approval. Error begets error and John UK revels in approving and spreading error. |
|
|
| 7/4/19 5:45 AM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Are we now finished with the Billy Graham magazine "Decision"? Congratulations to all who took part in the debate, for your resilience, determination, fortitude, even subterfuge from some; but hey, that's par for the course in any online debate, there will always be a troll or three hanging around to upset people, or cause division, that's their raison d'etre, or some such French naughtiness. I've never seen so many strawmen built in one thread, it has to be a record.
Ah well, it is all over now, and that is probably a good thing. But it teaches us to "redeem the time because the days are evil". Servants of Christ Jesus must only ever do what he tells them to do, and this is always my advice to all. Now that you’ve preened your not too immodest ego and self righteously condemned the behaviour of others do you feel better? You couldn’t have a better start to the day than stand and pray out loud for all to hear:Luke 18
11 God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. Congratulations. Your prayer has been heard and your desired aim of an even larger ego granted. |
|
|
| 6/30/19 1:12 PM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
I hope you are finding this helpful, despite the interruptions from hypercalviniums. You Sir are an appalling liar. If a person doesn’t deny that the gospel commands are to all sinners, then how can they be hypercalvs? |
|
|
| 6/30/19 7:42 AM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Particular redemption is a most wonderful thing to mine own mind. For it is none other than the Lord Jesus Christ particularly redeeming me, John UK, and is the cause of much inner rejoicing and the peace of God, which passes all understanding. If Christ died for every single individual including the lost, then he died particularly for the lost but wasn't able to redeem them by his death. Remind me again how his death redeemed you? Ah yes, you had the sense to trust his death but the lost didn’t. So it was your faith that redeemed you and their unbelief that damned them. Well done you for being so bright. |
|
|
| 6/27/19 10:41 AM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Mike wrote:
And Matthew 13:15
"For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them." John 1237 But though he had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not on him: 38 That the saying of Esaias the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spake, Lord, who hath believed our report? and to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed? 39 Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again, 40 He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them. Oh dear, there goes free will out of the window again. |
|
|
| 6/26/19 3:30 PM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Re: 2 Peter 3.9““The case stands thus: there was a promise of Christ’s second coming, to judge the world, delivered out; it was expected that this would have been very quickly, whereas it has been a long time deferred. Hence scoffers shall arise in the last days, charging the Lord with slackness and dilatoriness concerning his promise, though he is not slack with respect to it, but is long-suffering towards his elect, waiting till their number is completed in effectual vocation, and for their sakes bears with all the idolatry, superstition, and profaneness that are in the world; but when the last man that belongs to that number is called, he will stay no longer, but descend in flames of fire, take his own elect to himself, and burn up the world and the wicked in it.” John Gill |
|
|
| 6/25/19 2:41 PM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Remember what the arminians tell us that the ‘world’ means every single individual in the world. Ok. I’ll play. 1 John 2:15
Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. One should not to love every single individual on the earth and if any man does, the love of the Father is not in him. See I’m learning the new hermeneutic. 😁 |
|
|
| 6/25/19 10:51 AM |
| English Lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Looks like there’s been a convention of Evanjellyfish religion on this board this morning.  |
|
|
| 6/23/19 7:34 AM |
| English lad | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Mike wrote:
Grant you that, ladybug. It does seem odd, but only if we start from the premise that Jerusalem's destiny was destruction, and that the Lord forces people into the kingdom. Their destiny was wrought in their rejection of the Messiah. When Scripture records Jesus' lament, it doesn't say anything about him making any kind of distinction between the population. That has to be read into it. When he spoke to Jerusalem, he spoke of "thy children" in both Matthew 23:37 and Luke 13:34. He lamented because they, the children of Jerusalem, would not entrust to him, as chicks do to the mother hen. Just as he said. If they had been predestined to destruction, he would have been fully aware of it, and lamented not, for he is fully God even as the Son of man, who would have been the one predestined them. For the same reason he could pray:O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me Even though as God he knew that it wasn’t possible. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Page : [1] 2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
