John UK wrote:
he reveals things unto babes rather than the spiritual elite.

Spurgeon the Prince of Preachers spoke well of George Fox; even the Revised Version. It is difficult to pin Fox down; one minute he appears pure gospel, the next he follows 'inner light'. Bad theology of course gave rise to the excesses of the Quakers and then imbibed by the Charismatic movement.

Wesley was carried away by perfectionism and influenced by Guyon but warned:
AD 1776
" 'The grand source of all her mistakes was this, the not being guided by the written word. She did not take the Scripture for the rule of her actions; at most it was but the secondary rule. Inward impressions, which she called inspirations, were her primary rule. The written word was not a lantern to her feet, a light in all her paths. No; she followed another light, the outward light of her confessors, and the inward light of her own spirit.' (An extract of the Life of Madam Guion. By John Wesley)

John UK wrote:
Conviction of sin by the Holy Ghost is a sure sign

See the last paragraph of page 31 and the first 2 paragraphs from her autobiography, cop the link, it works!
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WR8T8l4NIlAC&pg=PA31&lpg=PA31&dq=o+my+lord,+thou+wast+in+my+heart,+and+demanded+only+a+simple+turning+of+my+mind+inward,+to+make+me+perceive+thy+presence.+oh,+infinite+goodness!+how+was+i+running+hither+and+thither+to+seek+thee,+my+life+was+a+burden+to+me,+although+my+happiness+was+within+myself.&source=bl&ots=tbEANTPHs6&sig=XPhbB4cnBOuKn8ypFGcJickpUm4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjWlriL4rbYAhVRK1AKHaceAfAQ6AEIOTAD#v=onepage&q=o%20my%20lord%2C%20thou%20wast%20in%20my%20heart%2C%20and%20demanded%20only%20a%20simple%20turning%20of%20my%20mind%20inward%2C%20to%20make%20me%20perceive%20thy%20presence.%20oh%2C%20infinite%20goodness!%20how%20was%20i%20running%20hither%20and%20thither%20to%20seek%20thee%2C%20my%20life%20was%20a%20burden%20to%20me%2C%20although%20my%20happiness%20was%20within%20myself.&f=false

John UK wrote:
Her words will never be understood by anyone other than babes. LTRU

"God reveals throughout this wonderful passage the powerful lesson of Abraham’s faith in Romans verses 18-25 of Chapter 4.
“He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness” (verses 20-22).
Download this powerful teaching today!

http://www.bennyhinn.org/shop/fresh-manna-4/fresh-manna-romans-4/

I could quote Benny Hinn with some good stuff, if I was very, very selective. Even find he believes the trinity and salvation as follows
https://www.bennyhinn.org/salvation/

If I didn't know any better I might even order his 'powerful teaching' from Romans above.

Here's something from one who read her works and also exposed Benny Sin.

The Mindless Mysticism of Madame Guyon

Countering the Myth of Intermittent Deification and Sinless Perfection

Guyon wrote of no conversion, only a presupposition that Christ was always in her heart. Thus she started her incredible lifelong journey within. She responded to the Lord, ‘‘Thou wast in my heart, and demanded only a simple turning of my mind inward, to make me perceive Thy presence. ... The kingdom of God is within you.’’

Guyon’s beliefs do not even come close to biblical Christianity. What she proposes is sheer essence mysticism and Catholicism mutated into even more horrible errors. That man could become like God was one of the first lies held out by Satan to Adam and Eve (Genesis 3). That Moody Press would continue to propagate this lie is beyond comprehension.
http://www.pfo.org/Madame%20Guyon.pdf

The above is a 5 page expose by G Richard Fisher who also wrote The Confusing World Of Benny Hinn, now updated with information below from the Berean Call
https://www.thebereancall.org/content/confusing-world-benny-hinn

Liberalism grows from the equally wicked seed of Arminianism.

SteveR wrote:
Beware of letting the devil Ian Paisley be your false prophet, even Calvin didnt agree with that

Thomas Cranmer (Anglican)
"Whereof it followeth Rome to be the seat of antichrist, and the pope to be very antichrist himself. I could prove the same by many other scriptures, old writers, and strong reasons." (Referring to prophecies in Revelation and Daniel.) Taken from Works by Cranmer, Vol. 1, pp. 6-7.

SteveR wrote:
Thats some antichrist you got there Jim. Poor guy cant reform simple Vatican bureaucracy, good luck taking over the world

"A careful study of prophecy and world history shows us that Papal Rome grew out of Imperial Rome. In Daniel chapter seven we have the foretelling of the rise of four great world empires.

Each of these great empires is represented by a particular beast.

The Fourth Beast

In Daniel 7:7 the rise of Imperial Rome is depicted. Rome followed Greece as the fourth great world empire. The 'ten horns' are the ten divisions of the Roman Empire - Italy, France, Spain, Germany, Britain, Sumatria, Parmonia, Asia, Greece and Egypt."

Christopher000 wrote:
I'm still scratching my head over this one. A sodomite, a tranny, and a lesbian calling themselves born again Christians, touring with other "Christian"groups, singing praise and worship songs. Huh?
Not unlike the openly gay Episcopal Pastors, how in the world do they justify this and reconcile it with the Bible? However they do it, talk about some twisted logic.

See for instance http://www.courage.org.uk/

Christopher000 wrote:
Thanks, Beware. I didn't know I had to be carful with him...just the opposite, in fact. I came across him when I came onto this site and was researching the Roman church.
I don't know who Mehaney is but I'll check. Faith healer maybe? I'll google him.

You should also read the following:

http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/separate/macrock.htm

Christopher000 wrote:
I'll do that...thanks. I really like John MacArthurs teaching, especially his Roman Catholic series that he did...very well done and informative.

Where does this blindness come from?

Arminianism.

The Biblical Reformers such as the Canons of Dordt writers were correct Arminianism is dangerous, unBiblical and heretical.

"What the Arminian wants to do is to arouse man's activity: what we want to do is to kill it once for all---to show him that he is lost and ruined, and that his activities are not now at all equal to the work of conversion; that he must look upward. They seek to make the man stand up: we seek to bring him down, and make him feel that there he lies in the hand of God, and that his business is to submit himself to God, and cry aloud, 'Lord, save, or we perish.' We hold that man is never so near grace as when he begins to feel he can do nothing at all. When he says, 'I can pray, I can believe, I can do this, and I can do the other,' marks of self-sufficiency and arrogance are on his brow."
(C. H. Spurgeon)

christian charity wrote:
Excited that God TV is introducing some more encouragement audio sermons to the people

Equally ODD and SUSPICIOUS that you link to a paypal account that has no connection with the charity.

John UK wrote:
..It appears that there are many different authors on that site, and not all of them have worked out correctly the practical outworking of the doctrines.
..

John UK wrote:
Aha! But would hyperman say this:
..

John UK wrote:
I've also bookmarked the site, and had a quick glimpse at the following article, which I found to be right up my street. It is called "God's Part and Man's Part" [URL=http://www.geocities.com/pvrosman/Gods_Part_Mans_Part_In_Salvation.html]]]In Salvation[/URL]
There are also many other articles which I will be reading in due course, so I thank thee kindly, sir...

Check out for instance:

[url=http://www.geocities.com/pvrosman/Particular_Baptist.html]]] Method of presenting the gospel[/url]

Be warned!

..."MacArthur writes: “The believing sinner is justified by righteousness infused into him” (Justification, 122)...