|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ JAMESC ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 9 · Found: 208 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 3/26/13 12:47 AM |
| jamesc | | Fallbrook, CA | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Can't have the B I B L E, but you can have the L G B T Q books in public school.  Live in a one-bedroom apartment, take the bus to work, but just get your God-given children out of the public/charter schools, no matter the cost. Check out the movie INDOCTRINATION. Render under Caesar the taxes, render unto God those whom he has entrusted you with... |
|
|
| 3/25/13 10:04 AM |
| jamesc | | Fallbrook, CA | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Christopher000 wrote:
I am actually a little bit angry that after so much time spent ... fact, after fact, after fact, it all continues to fall upon deaf ears. No reason to be frustrated. Two issues: tradition is very powerful, and dead people cannot believe the truth (Ephesians 2, Romans 8:7, John 3). We preach the Gospel, sow the seeds and only God does the work. Our wisdom and eloquence cannot and does not convert people (most American Evangelicals would disagree---Paul Washer points this out in his crusade against decisional regeneration). Google "How to botch an altar call" and view the video by livingwaters/way of the master. Funny, but sad. |
|
|
| 3/24/13 11:35 PM |
| jamesc | | Fallbrook, CA | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote:
Frank, False, the Catholic Church is not a Cult since it worships Jesus as God. A Cult does not worship Jesus as God. I would say RCC worship another Jesus, than the Jesus of the Bible. They worship a Jesus you can't approach because he's too busy (i.e. go to Mary). They worship a Jesus whose work and atonement was insufficient for salvation for those who believe (i.e. purgatory, penance, treasury of merit, works of supererogation, last rites, etc). The worship a Jesus whom they can call down from heavy to their altar (i.e. the Mass). They worship a Jesus who appears to still hang on a cross. I'd almost say they worship another God (idolatry) since they saw fit to remove the second commandment about graven images. Apparently their God is ok with graven images.In any event there have been heresies that deny Jesus came in the flesh and only had a spirit (Gnostics, see John's epistles)-- Christian Science anybody? Your definition of Cult is too narrow. Or maybe Cult is the wrong word...how about false religion. I believe John MacArthur said RCC was a pagan religion with a sprinkling of Jesus. |
|
|
| 3/22/13 2:33 PM |
| jamesc | | Fallbrook, CA | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jamesc wrote:
'For Academics' is the worst worldly reason. What I meant to say was that academics should not be the primary reason for homeschooling for Christians. It should be Ephesians 6:4. It should be for discipleship because the smartest kid in the world will still end up in hell if he is not trusting in Jesus alone for his salvation. |
|
|
| 3/15/13 2:31 PM |
| jamesc | | fallbrook, ca | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Ha! I'm outta here - someone's got to make the tea. 
James, I'll have to get back to your very important question later, but just a quick note, that if a Bible is said to be the word of God, it MUST be inerrant, otherwise it is NOT the word of God. The claim of many today that "the originals" were inerrant is a clever manipulation of evangelical thought, trying to mould it into unbelief.  Thanks John (and Frank). I see your point. This logic is definitely something the cults (JW, Mormon, Catholic, Cheap-Grace folks, etc.) use to attack Sola Scriptura. Thanks for your patience. |
|
|
| 3/12/13 1:46 AM |
| jamesc | | Fallbrook, ca | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
the removal of the most important word in the Bible, namely BLOOD, and other such corruptions, along with, as you say, a disbelief in God's inspired and inerrant word available to us today in our native language. Ahh. This sounds like a KJV-only blast against Ham. Sorry guys, the Bible was originally written in three languages: aramaic, hebrew, greek---not in ol' english. It was written by over 40 authors from different walks in life on three different continents over a period of 1500 years. I guess the translations by Tyndale, Wycliff and Luther were not good enough? KJV is only one of many translations. Some translations stink, but KJV is not the only valid translation. It is self-righteous to claim that the KJV is only valid. I guess only english-speaking folks are saved by your standard. This is just silly. What a waste of time. Why not just be upfront with this KJV-only-ism? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/26/13 3:22 PM
