|
|
USER COMMENTS BY MIKE |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 8 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
12/15/2020 7:00 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Interesting comment John Lee. Mike, the only problem was the huge number of people that the Republicans will certainly Republicans wanted to disenfranchise, so they falsely could win in an election. 👎 —- That’s hilarious, Jim. But in fairness to you, name someone who the Repubs wanted to disenfranchise. I know it’s a stretch, but could you be specific? |
|
|
12/15/2020 8:04 AM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
The Quiet Christian wrote: What I've seen is that the pandemic has changed directions for at least some preaching, but any Advent pieces are overshadowed by the larger response. For instance, we know a Church that has focused intently on the Lord's attributes...lifting the gaze of the attendees and viewers from horizontal to vertical in order to fight back wide spread improper fear. QC, Perhaps a simultaneous teaching/preaching on how to discern deception would also reduce irrational fear. It is always good to focus on the Lord, but we are not called to ignore the wiles of the devil. |
|
|
12/12/2020 4:36 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
James Thomas wrote: Here's one example of what your looking for. The term "wondering stars" is a metaphoric descriptive term for the angels which kept not their first estate (verse 6) Jude 1:13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever. Hi James. Here’s where I would have issue with this. Those for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever don’t quite add up to guiding lights. They are not sources of light at all. Other than the word “star” the commonality eludes. I think of the term “shooting star” which is commonly used, though as you know is not a star at all, but used of meteors. No relationship to stars. As for the star that guided the “wise men” it wasn’t wandering, but had direction and goal. |
|
|
12/12/2020 11:17 AM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Mike, there are several reasons why the 2020 election is not like the one in Bush versus Gore❗👎 For an overview see: "FACT CHECK: What's Happening In This Election Is Not Like Florida In 2000" https://tinyurl.com/y5rlfqvr --- One big reason that it's not like Florida in 2000 is the Dominion vote switching scam. You should bypass reading leftwing Democrat propaganda, and look into it. There is so much information available, there is no excuse. As for an opinion, there is no way on this green Earth that Biden, of all people, could win more popular vote than anyone in history. Sorry, but he can't generate interest, let alone enthusiasm. It just doesn't add up. |
|
|
12/12/2020 11:06 AM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Frank wrote: Pilgrim, Why couldn’t the Lord simply allow these men to see the star the way they did; as a guide. IOW, the star moved “for them” and the Lord helped them follow it. Yes, this would be a miracle, but there is nothing difficult for the Lord. When they got to the manger, the Lord said stop, you are here. Or an angel from heaven helped them navigate using the star. Of course the Lord didn’t need to use a star, but He did. Saying it was solely an angel doesn’t detract from the meaning, but it changes what was said. An angel would have been just as miraculous. Just because we don’t understand how or why the Lord used a star doesn’t change the fact that He did. No argument with you or QC, just the musings of an old man. Agree with your thoughts on this, Frank. We also could ask where else in Scripture are angels presented as taking the form of bright lights in the sky? |
|
|
12/11/2020 6:52 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Mike, there's a Bloomberg article which I don't think I'll dig up, that says Trump should be impeached again for what he's trying to do to the country. I suppose since they'll be over in 40 days most educated people are gritting their teeth and thinking that it will be least be over by then. I don't hear that Nancy Pelosi is trying to have another impeachment trial, though I certainly agree that she can, or at least censor Mr. Trump. 👍 —- Did anyone seek impeachment or censorship when Al Gore tried to upend the election of Bush through weeks of repeated vote recounts? Long term memory loss, Jim? Or standard liberal hypocrisy? |
|
|
12/11/2020 1:29 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: excerpt from, "Donald Trump's experts talk a big game about the vaccine rollout plan. We're about to find out if it's all hype" https://tinyurl.com/y5cpt6qh I am anxiously awaiting to get my jabs❗👍💉 Why get a jab? Aren’t you wearing a mask? Maintaining social distancing? Avoiding church meeting? You know, the things The experts say keep you safe. |
|
|
12/10/2020 6:17 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: —- excerpt from, "The Republican Party is a danger to American democracy" ❗ https://tinyurl.com/y5cv6d2j The Democrat Party is a danger to the American Republic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|