|
Page 1 | Page 8 · Found: 331 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
1/7/09 5:21 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
A little history wrote: “Firstly, we are greatly troubled that at this year's 'Gay Pride' parade in Belfast a new low was reached by the unhindered display of a placard blaspheming the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. As you know, your government subsidises this obnoxious event and yet, to date, we have not heard of you or your party resisting this iniquitous misuse of tax-payers' money.Will you be writing to the DCAL minister,Mr Edwin Poots, and to the Director of the Northern Ireland Events Company to object to the funding of this parade? Has a complaint from you been lodged with the Parades Commission? To participate in implementing legislation that promotes sin is to participate in rebellion against the Lord Jesus Christ. The fact that the higher authorities in Westminster or Brussels may require it is no justification; 'Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye'(Acts 4:19); 'we ought to obey God rather than men'(Acts 5:29).Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego did not bow down to the golden image despite the fact that the human law requiring it was crystal clear(Dan.3:16-18)." PAISLEY SILENT THEN pains me to say it,but I have to agree!! |
|
|
12/30/08 11:01 AM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Banned wrote: God's covenant with Abraham was with Abraham only. Blessing Abraham does not carry over to every person with one drop of Abraham's genes in their body 6,000 years later. Further, the part about Abraham's seed blessing the nations, this is explained to us in Galatians 3 and 4, and if the Zionists would read these chapters over carefully they could be deprogrammed, delivered from Zionism. Gal. 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. Zionism is Illuminati lies foisted on the church by Rothschild through his agent CI Scofield. isn't it just possible that what you are trying argue refers not to your inference,but to Ishmael? This is based on the quotation about through Isaac, not Ishmael, will your offspring be named. Thus Gal 3:16 should/could be translated "he does not refer to all, but rather to one group" you seem to be hung up the illuminati....the religion of high freemasonry should be your target,if that's what's bothering you. |
|
|
12/30/08 10:26 AM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
The concept of a "remnant" is central in the Tanakh ie-an Israel within the larger Israel that represents both the chosen and the faithful of God.A remnant will return to God. For though your people, O Israel, may be like the sand of the sea, Only a remnant within them will return. (Isaiah 10:21-22) To be an Israelite, a member of the Chosen People, does not guarantee membership in the Remnant People. Mere birth among the tribes of Jacob and circumcision of the body determine nothing about one's soul. There are two circumcisions. The first one, a male has no choice about(he receives it at eight days old and enters into the Covenant People). The second one, he (or any woman) has complete choice in. And he must exercise that choice to enter into the Remnant People: Circumcise then your heart. (Deuteronomy 10:16; cf. 30:6) I will punish all who are circumcised and yet uncircumcised--all the house of Israel are uncircumcised of heart. (Jeremiah 9:25-26) "All Israel will be saved" (Romans 11:26). Paul connected Israel's salvation with a redemptive act described in Isaiah: "The Deliverer will come to Zion, he will remove rebellion from Jacob" (Isa 59:20). so sorry,Banned-your "impression" is sadly mistaken |
|
|
12/30/08 10:05 AM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
over come evil wrote: [URL=http://www.eaec.org/newsletters/1999/NL1999jul.htm]]]www.eaec.org/newsletters/1999/NL1999jul.htm[/URL] He will be of Jewish descent and a practicing homosexual. why must he be of Jewish descent....?and the point about him being a practicing homosexual is a mistaken reference to the verse in scripture about him having no desire for the regard of women the regard of the Jewish woman is the wish that they would be the one chosen to be the vessel to carry the messiah he may well be a homo,but that's not what is meant here for a response to the arab lies about Israel being promoted here... http://www.afsi.org/arablies.htm |
|
|
12/30/08 8:13 AM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
the "so-called state of Israel" as you so laughably put it was prophesied thousands of years ago to be born in a single day in scripture.....maybe you call God "so-called God" as well? how do you explain the thousands of arabs living and working quite happily inside Israel beside their Jewish neighbours,yet all the attention is focussed on the rabid dog that is Gaza? the loony left will never publicise that!! |
|
|
12/30/08 4:09 AM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Banned wrote: The Bible doesn't say the natural branches broken off are all going to be grafted back in because they are not. you appear to have little grasp of what is set out in Romans 11 .God has set aside Israel. But,not totally.Earlier in the chapter, he says that there is a remnant according to the election of grace in chapter 5.Later in chapter 11, he says, all Israel is going to be saved. But, he also says in Acts 4, , "that neither is there salvation any other. For there is none other name under heaven given among men by whereby we must be saved." He said that to Jews in the city of Jerusalem who were the Jewish leaders. So, what he is saying is, Israel was set aside temporarily and partially. And in their setting aside, the riches were turned to the Gentiles. After the Gentiles fullness has come in, after the church is complete, God will go back and redeem Israel,as they turn to the one whom they have pierced and it's a common cry of those who vilify Israel that they are not anti semitic,rather they are "anti zionist" heard it all before.....your views have much in common with those expressed in a well known racist/anti jewish forum. |
|
|
12/29/08 6:15 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Neil wrote: "My" ethics? A "human" construct? So,employing the ethical values you have thus derived from the commandments,epistles etc,was the action of Joshua ethical or unethical?It cannot stand in isolation.If you wish to employ an ethical view,it should surely be employed universally,and not on an a la carte basis.Ethics is a human(ist) invention..... Humanists/atheists would strongly claim to be "ethical" with "ethical" values,and in fact in some humanist quarters,the fact that elements of Christianity would seek to clothe themselves with the "ethical" label is the subject of some derision.Not that that bothers me greatly! They clearly do not derive their label or values ostensibly from scripture,and it could be argued ad infinitum as to where they do derive them,but that's another story entirely. anyway...this is geting off topic,ethics or no ethics..... Israel has the right to defend her citizens. End of! |
|
|
12/29/08 3:16 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Neil wrote: GK, I'm promoting "replacement theology" by making an ethical point, and asking for logically defensible terminology? You sure jump to conclusions quickly. ethics is an essentially human construct is it not?ok....tackle this with your "ethics" God commanded Joshua to go into the Promised Land and destroy the cities he was given,and to leave not one man,woman or child alive in them from an ethical point of view,I'm assuming(if you allow assumptions!!)that you would believe that to be "unethical" in human terms and from a human perspective.... does your ethics therefore presume to trump the command of God and the action of Joshua in that case? and banned...where did I state that the root was anything but Jesus?You also neglect to mention that the natural branches will again be grafted back in to the root.....we have not usurped the Jews in God's plan.....they will again have their day,no matter how much the jew haters may not like it you are plainly an anti semite..... |
|
|
12/29/08 2:27 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
the relevance is that there were promises made to Israel which are immutable,Christianity not withstandingWhat you are putting forward sounds like replacement theology....I may be wrong,and I am open to correction on this,but it's the impression I am getting what exactly would constitute a curse in this case.....?I would suggest that some of the comments made earlier in this thread about jews would fit the bill,and especially despicable if they originated from professing Christians... |
|
|
12/29/08 1:48 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
I think we should not lose sight of the fact that the gentile Christians are wild branches grafted in to the root of the tree.....this site addresses this issue much better and in greater length than I ever could hope to,and why we should support Israel today http://www.christiansstandingwithisrael.com/grafted-in.html also,how would you tackle the point I made about your 2000BC Mongolian analogy? |
|
|
12/29/08 12:57 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Neil wrote: I'm talking about ethics, not eschatology. you made the point of a promise to Israel being negated by the sermon on the mount....God does not break His promises,especially to his chosen people |
|
|
12/29/08 12:50 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
does it make this moot as well?Zechariah Ch12 12:1 The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him. 12:2 Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem. 12:3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it. your analogy of the 2000BC Mongolians being obviously ignorant of the circumstances under discussion-does that impinge upon their eternal position as well? ie how can they be held to eternal account for something they were not informed about? |
|
|
12/29/08 12:33 PM |
GK | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Neil wrote: With Gen. 12:3, what about those who neither bless nor curse Jews? that's called "sitting on the fence" leaves a big crease in your hind quarter if you sit too long!! notice the UN sec gen has been demanding a ceasefire would carry a little more credibility if they hadn't kept ignoring the missile attacks on Israel for months on end.... no surprises there |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|