Reformed Theology is a term for ‚Äúwe just moved a little bit down the block from the Papacy.‚ÄĚūü§ģ Some of their heresies are: Necessary consequences,Conditional Grace, Self- Righteous Assurance, Legalism, and Sacramentalism to just name a few. Their confessions WCF and 1689 London are almost identical except for Baptism. Be careful, many on here continue to push this tripe. Most of what is written on their documents is nothing but rehashed romanism.Yep.
This is an internet news forum that posts up religious and worldly news. By no stretch of the imagination could it be deemed a corporate worship and teaching service that glorifies GOD. It is used as a social media outlet where everyone male and female are free to express their views from politics to religion, nothing more and nothing less.
I‚Äôll never forget the words of an old Cajun preacher of long time past. ‚ÄúIt‚Äôs neither this nor that, but Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners...are you a sinner?, then come to Christ‚ÄĚ.
Upon further contemplation of this subject. When we attended SBC ‚Äėchurches‚Äô the leadership we‚Äôre promoting BM and her sorcery in all their Sunday School classes and home Bible studies. So it was the MEN who brought in this Jezebel and her teachings and were oh sooo enamored with her.ūü§∑‚Äć‚ôÄÔłŹ. Plenty of blame on both sides of the fence.
Wayfarer pilgrim wrote: Gentlemen; Repent! Confess your sins before God, then; Go into your wife‚Äôs closet, find the books by Beth Moore and toss in a goodwill box. Best place to start. Then, start family devotions with the family, pray unceasingly and sing hymns to the top of lungs. Take back your home! Be the Christian leader God placed you in charge of.
Except burn the BM books That sorcery should never find it way into anyone‚Äôs hands.
John, no one is ‚Äúattacking‚ÄĚ anyone. But, to propagate false ways needs to be addressed. Your RC view of the Lord‚Äôs Table is not shared by most on here, because it‚Äôs not Biblical. You have a romanist belief of it. No need to respond to this, I am taking my leave, as I have said what needs to be said and I am not getting in to a donnybrook about this.
No, Adriel, I was not reminding anyone of verse 4 of chapter 28. Sister ladybug has answered it correctly by posting up (section 1.) That was what I was referring to. As for the rest of the diatribe you posted up, not interested in documents of old church men, and their continuation of Rome‚Äôs abominations.
Some have read to many catechism‚Äôs, catholic mystics, and lofty writings of men, trying to reach a ‚Äė higher religious experience‚Äô. That‚Äôs fine and your prerogative...just don‚Äôt try and foist that nonsense on the rest of us. As the book of James states, ‚Äú not many should be teachers‚ÄĚ.
HM, no one said for you not to read men of old...I‚Äôve been there, done that, my conscience is clear to read only my Bible. Ya know the Bible sheds a lot of light on all those commentaries and lofty writings of men.ūüėČ. Take care.