Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
1058

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -6 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ BY YOUR STANDARDS, NOT ELECT ”
Page 1 | Page 6 ·  Found: 158 user comments posted recently.
News Item6/5/07 11:28 AM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
127
comments
Dan:

So, are they "ememies" in the sense of someone like the Philistines in the O.T.--obviously unrepentant and ought to be put to the sword?

Did Jesus make the distinction of "neighboring enemies"?


News Item6/4/07 11:17 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
127
comments
Dan and Mike:

So, is GG (or Lance) your neighbor?


News Item5/29/07 10:30 AM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
6
comments
Jim:

Or better yet: Christians and Christians, never together.


News Item4/26/07 1:41 AM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
26
comments
I was thinking you were making both an ontological and a political point by invoking dialectical materialism and claiming he bought dialectical materialism and theism. My comment was directed more to his ontological stance than his politics. I think it's pretty clear he's not a dialectical materialist a la Sartre or Marx for that matter. If the "papists" criticize capitalism, it will be because of different metaphysical commitments than the Marxist. That's my only point.

Other than that, I understand the point you are making, Neil.


News Item4/25/07 7:51 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
26
comments
Take a look at Ratzinger's book "Truth and Tolerance" where he gives a summary of his view of Liberation Theology. Marxist economic theory is a primary aspect of that particular theological slant, especially given it's view of sin being primarily located in political and social structures (thus changing the way salvation and conversion operate). I think he articulates it in such a way that his view is not a difference in degree but fundamentally a difference in kind.

News Item4/3/07 12:35 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
66
comments
What do you make of the president's comment about the Nicene Creed?

News Item3/26/07 9:18 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
28
comments
I suppose he could mean Catholic politics, although given what he's been speaking about concerning the religious and moral bankruptcy of Europe, I'm not sure it can be reduced completely to the political sphere. It is true, however, that the cultural sphere and political sphere tend to bleed into one another.

News Item3/26/07 8:15 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
28
comments
So, would you say it is not the case that "A society in which the Christian conscience does not live anymore loses direction, does not know anymore where to go, ends up empty and bankrupt"? Are you disagreeing with that statement merely because the Pope said it, or because the statement is false?

News Item3/6/07 9:11 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
56
comments
Thanks Neil. I was curious what your position was on the matter. That clarifies things nicely.

News Item3/6/07 8:06 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
56
comments
Rather than actually debate global warming per se, something which I don't have the resources nor desire to do, I would like to ask Neil a question. Do you think reality (be it the natural world, conceptual realities, etc.) has an intelligible, rational structure? I would like to satisfy my curiosity.

News Item2/14/07 3:52 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
11
comments
Here is a resource that may prove helpful. It's written by experts in the field of philosophy but, as with any encyclopedia, should only be taken as having cursory overviews on disputed topics and concepts.

http://plato.stanford.edu


News Item2/14/07 2:58 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
11
comments
My comment about "dielectrics" was merely poking a little fun at the misspelling in an earlier post, that's all.

If anyone understands Hegel, they are a better person than I am.


News Item2/14/07 1:11 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
11
comments
"Dielectrics" almost sounds like "dianetics".

News Item1/16/07 6:18 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
21
comments
I'm actually with you on this one, Neil.

News Item1/3/07 8:19 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
33
comments
That makes much more sense. I really wasn't sure what that was. My apologies, John, if I was trying your patience.

Carry on.


News Item1/3/07 7:26 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
33
comments
Which John posted the comment above mine? Was it a response to my question about "cecationist"?

News Item1/3/07 5:01 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
33
comments
Out of curiosity, what is a "cecationist"?

News Item12/14/06 5:22 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
36
comments
Fair enough, Neil. Actually, I'm grateful we were able to chase this as far as we did on these threads. I think you've got a good mind.

Ultimately, I think the kind of empiricism you despise is a very modern version of it. It, in effect, limits the kinds and principles of explanations one can invoke for most phenomena. Furthermore, it tends to be reductive and materialistic. This, I think, is a mistake.

Please don't mistake my questioning for luring. I think our conversation was helpful.

Good day.


News Item12/14/06 5:11 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
36
comments
Actually, I'm not entirely sure why you interpret Rom. 1:12 as being somehow against the senses. Otherwise, it sounds like you are a Platonist.

News Item12/14/06 4:49 PM
By Your Standards, Not Elect | Oblivion  Find all comments by By Your Standards, Not Elect
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
36
comments
Are you saying both Thomas and Aristotle argue for behaviorist "tabula rasa" (I'm not entirely sure what that is. It sounds vaguely Humean however)? Once again, I think you are conflating their position with that of a Humean skeptic. What do you think a teleological proof is intended to show?
Finally, what is the content of this innate knowledge? Is there actually a God "idea" somewhere in the furniture of our minds? Merely having a logical structure to thought and language doesn't exactly impart anything positive because it is formal and has no content, per se. It can't make any existential claims.
Would you accept someone's claim that the scripture (Say, the book of Mormon or the Koran) is foundational and, when asked why, say it claims to be so and that is why you must accept it? I'm beginning to think your entire epistemic foundation really relies on some kind of election model that you haven't revealed yet.
Jump to Page : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8





Technology, Not Techniques

Shawn Reynolds
Abundant Mercy For Life in Him

Sovereign Grace Church
Sunday Service
Play! | MP3

Dr. Fred DeRuvo
Daniel 7 Pt 3 Interpretation..

Book of Daniel
Study-Grow-Know Ministries
Video!Play! | MP4

Mark S. Wisniewski
Sobreviviendo El Juicio

Lucas - Spanish 2023
Iglesia Nueva Obra en...
Play! | MP3

Sponsor:
New Podcast for Pastors from NAMB

Join podc­ast host, Ken Whitten & guests Tony Dungy, H.B. Charlr­es, Jr. & more.
https://www.namb.net/podcas..

Sponsor:
The Book Of Romans

Join Pastor Thomas Irvin for a study thr­ough the book of Rom­ans, verse by verse, at G
https://www.sermonaudio.com..

Sermon: The Importance of Truth & Love
Shawn Reynolds

SPONSOR | 5,000+

SPONSOR



SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
TECH TALKS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Podcasting
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription
Business Cards New!
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

THE VAULT VLOG
Technology, Not Techniques New!
Copyright © 2024 SermonAudio.