Great Sermon! 'Even the alien hieroglyphics were nothing more than flower images and child-like designs used on the packing tape'
Check out the above link on the 1947 Roswell incident. Methinks professing christians are guilty of being deceived and consequently unintentionally deceiving others-make uo your own minds.
Get Genesis 6: 1-2 wrong and much error follows.
The antichrist we all agree will not be coming in a UFO as he is already discernable throughout Christian History. "The historic interpretation has been embodied in the most solemn confessions of the biblical world. It forms a leading part in the testimony of martyrs and reformers. Like the prophets of old, these holy men bore a twofold testimony, a testimony for the truth of God, and a testimony against the Apostasy of those professing to be Christian. Their testimony was that Papal Rome is the Babylon of prophecy, â€śâ€¦that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth,â€ť  and that its head, the Roman pontiff, is the predicted â€śMan of Sin,â€ť or Antichrist.'
Trust my comments will be acceptable as a historical viewpoint and in charity to discern all things!
The above link is from a fundementalist baptist. I could better supply links from my own calvinist position but i know that is not your own so stick with the above.
Ruckman is a dangerous man and it wouldn't take much research to understand and discern such. Even on the KJV he is untrustworthy and plain wrong and I would always stick to Trinitarian Bible Society. Contact them for their position on Ruckman(ism).
Also 'Way of Life Literature Fundamental Baptist Information Service'
Under the paragraph title below you will learn where an ardent Fund baptist David Cloud stands on Ruckman-check the link above
'WHITE IGNORES THE FACT THAT TENS OF THOUSANDS OF KING JAMES BIBLE DEFENDERS REJECT PETER RUCKMAN AND HIS STRANGE IDEAS AND HIS CARNAL DEMEANOR.'
I hope Christian that evidence will help you better discern Ruckman.
God bless you
PS ruckmanism of genuine reformation
scan to 'From Racsict ruckmanism to reformed Theology'
"OK, John Yurich, then let's do this: Let's take a mortal man, a wretched sinner just like every other mortal man, and let's put him in a nice robe. Let's allow him to live in absolute splendor with unfathomable wealth and resources. He can travel the world with a stupid hat on his wretchedly sinful head that indicates that he is the 'Vicar of Christ'. Let's even give him a bulletproof 'popemobile' to ride around in. Let's adore him, kiss his ring, fall at his feet and cry when we see him. Let's consider his every utterance to be an edict from God. Let's decide what's right and what's wrong, what's sinful and what's not sinful based on his wretched, sinful, mortal judgement. Let's ignore or blow off the history of his office and the historically corrupt organization he represents.
Now let's call him "THE HOLY FATHER".
What absolute blasphemy. That's why those who understand call him Anti-Christ"
You are the man with NO NAME and make claims as a concerned FP. I guess few wise men heed your comments here unless you come out of your 'prayer closet' (I trust as a 'concerned FP' you have Rev Paisley always in your prayers?) and make yourself known.
I would prefer to listen to the opinions of such as Ivan Foster- those in the FPC who do not hide away in secrecy like timid mice. What are you afraid of?
Rev Paisley is no timid mouse and surely if you are so concerned about him you could easily find your way to the communion service with the other 15...there is bound to be opportunity to speak then to Ian Paisley face-to-face as a christian brother is meant to do?
You blow your own trumpet and come out and say who you are if you want support or as Joe bloggs you are no better than his minister: 'my old minister he was against paisley but would not preach it from the pulpit in case it "split the church" as a result he looked like a moral coward'
No place for any cowards or chocolate soldiers in Christ's church. Only cowards remain annony-mouse for reasons they should fully disclose if they wish to be taken seriously.
Martin Luther didn't hide like a mouse-by your words you seem to want reform in your church-what will do you do Martin jr?
Have a read of these two articles-one by the Banner of Truth and the other a speech by the christian General Willaim Dobbie himself regarding the siege of Malta which was a remarkable example of GOD IS MY DEFENCE in a just war where The Sovereign God placed a christian leader!
At the time Mr. J.H. Gosden wrote: "O if Britain could boast of ten such righteous men in her high places, how different would be her prospects! We are profoundly thankful for this witness humbly and simply borne to the faithfulness of God and the reality of His salvation in Christ."
It is wise for those who are Reformed but little concerned and those who say they are neither Reformed nor Arminian to at leat understand what 'arminianism' actually is and why it has to be rejected with open Bible in hand. Some good links which may be helpful------
Arminian Errors: from the Tract, Another Gospel by William MacLean http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/articles/full.asp?id=1|54|421
Arminianismâ€”Another Gospel by Rev. William Maclean, M.A.
see article in list
Arminianism - The Road back to Rome by Rev. Augustus Toplady
'The Calvinists are the children of the pharisees'
I am convinced Christian will one day deeply regret such a statement. C H Spurgeon a Pharisee? All Calvinists pharisees? The majority of ministers on sermonaudio? Some of the ministries where you have left a comment e.g. Rev Ian brown? For a gentleman who doesn't know anything about arminianism(as your earlier comment) how is it that you have studied calvinism enough to have rejected such I wonder?
Have a study of the writings of C H Spurgeon and John Bunyan. Particularly read the sermons of Mr Spurgeon http://www.spurgeon.org/
I am sure you will withdraw your judgement AFTER some prayerful reading of the above-but will you do the study? God be with you.