I know two sources right off the top of my head, but I think I'm going to dust my feet off with you and obey Scripture according to Matthew 7:6, Titus 3:10, and 2 John 9-10.

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

No GG you will not find ANY persecutions made by true fundamental Baptists any time in history. And note that I said "true Fundamental Baptists". Every group who uses the name Baptist are not.

And no, I'm not a protestant or as you like to say "prot", I'm a Baptist. Theres a BIG difference. You "lics" need to get it right.

You mean like when your institution burned and tortured all the "heretics" for preaching the true gospel to them?

The next inquisition is just waiting on everything to line up prophetically, and it will make the first look like a minor street fight. You can read about it in the book of Revelation-- but you won't be able to understand according 1 Cor. 2:13-14. I would say to go and ask your priest, but he won't be able to either according to the same verse.

Lance Eccles wrote:
My answer would be that the Eastern Orthodox are actually Catholics, even though their hierarchy refuses to acknowledge the primacy of the Bishop of Rome.

John Yurich wrote:
What is with you and the other lousy Evangelical/Fundamentalist Protestants on here who keep stating the same nonsense over and over again that the RCC believes in "another Jesus"? The Apostles and Nicene Creeds which are the Statements Of Faith of the RCC states "WE BELIEVE IN ONE LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE ONLY SON OF GOD". Now, that is the biblical and historical Jesus that the RCC believes in.

Lance Eccles wrote:
"Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you." (John 6:53)

Mike wrote:
I confess to not having adjusted to the misuse of "gay" for homosexual yet. Likely because it's a relatively new euphemism. Can't find many cheerful homosexuals, though. Gay they're not. So I will continue to use "gay" in the proper sense of the word when I find it misapplied. Defiant, I suppose. Still have hope for it. Perhaps you can do the same for "liberal"? Good luck.!

"As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God: They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one."

GG wrote:
If you really understood Catholicism you never would have left.

GG wrote:
Unlike you, I don't presume to know the ins and outs of YOUR religion...you guys figure it out. Just don't blame your failures on us.

Mike wrote:
Sure He did. Mercury, Uranium, Gold, etc.

rocker wrote:
Coora
are you saying that i don't worship god properly with my heavy metal? welll, i am insulted. as a matter of fact, as i listen to heavy metal, i remember that god has created everything, including heavy metal. that is how i worship god. if you have something against that, explain what it is and why.

[URL=http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/christianmusic-must-fit.html]]]Christian Music Must Fit the Christian Message[/URL]

GG wrote:
How typically Baptist of Preacherjond, to blame the problems of a degenerating denomination on some scape-goat 'ism'. Face up to it, Baptists have a long row to hoe.

GG wrote:
...for my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink...

"It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life."

W. J. Mencarow wrote:
The Second Beast of Revelation (Rev. 13), which comes as a lamb (the Lamb of God) but speaks as the dragon (Satan), is commonly called Antichrist. Until relatively recently, the church has always taught that this is a counterfeit church, one that claims to be the church of Christ but is not. And no organization fits that description in the whole context of Scripture than Roman Catholicism; not one Pope, but the institution of the Papacy. This is what the church has always taught since the Papacy first manifested itself. It was only until the 19th century that this was even questioned by anyone outside the Roman faith.
Please see http://snipurl.com/revela

supralap wrote:
preacherjond...From Merriam webster...1: study of religious faith, practice, experience; esp. the study of God and of God's relation to the world.

2 a: a theological theory or system Thomist theology a theology of atonement b: a distinctive body of theological opinion Catholic theology
3: a usually 4-year course of specialized religious training in a Roman Catholic major seminary