Michael Hranek wrote: Wow! I don't know exactly how God will handle this in His Divine Providenc and Sovereignty BUT If it comes to it, think of the opportunity for prison ministry
Acts 16:25 KJV (25)Â And at midnight Paul and Silas prayed, and sang praises unto God: and the prisoners heard them.
Acts 16:27 KJV (27)Â And the keeper of the prison awaking out of his sleep, and seeing the prison doors open, he drew out his sword, and would have killed himself, supposing that the prisoners had been fled.
Acts 16:28-31 KJV (28)Â But Paul cried with a loud voice, saying, Do thyself no harm: for we are all here. (29)Â Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas, (30)Â And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? (31)Â And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
BELIEVE ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, AND THOU SHALT BE SAVED, AND THY HOUSE.
Yes indeed, no problem. "The Lord is rich unto all that call upon him". cf. Romans 10:12-13.
cv wrote: This is going to drag on unnecessarily. I will say that when you jump in and affirm something, and later revise/clear it up, the point being made is lost. This is something I keep running up with you.
If you quote something I have actually written, and then comment on it, it is far better than speculating on what I believe, which it seems most people get wrong, simply because they prefer me to be wrong, and will use any means to show that, so that they can argue with me, which some people love to do, rather than seeking to edify and bless their fellows.
I do hope the above edifies you and blesses your heart and gives you a better way forward in debating the points made by other people.
If you think something I have written is incorrect, please quote me and show me where my error is (according to YOUR standard, and I accept that you have a standard), and I will answer you according to MY standard (and I hope you accept that I have a standard).
"when you jump in and affirm something, and later revise/clear it up" you said.
2. Watcher posts start with an absolute obedience to government, no exceptions. And you abet.
3. THAT IS AN ERROR!. The bible demonstrates both!
Good morning cv. I hope you are feeling content, happy and full of the Spirit. Now the answers to your questions and statements...
1. Certainly not! And I hope you can also say, "Certainly not!"
2. Incorrect, as the following post by myself shows: 10/3/2020 4.22AM
"The 'obey/disobey your government' is a big debate, and some parts of scripture say to obey, other parts to disobey in certain circumstances."
3. Quite so. And if you read all my posts, including the one above, you will see my position on that.
Thank you for showing an interest in my spiritual welfare. It is a very rare thing these days for Christian brethren and sisters to have a genuine concern for their fellows.
If you believe in the Lord's Day being Sunday without much biblical warrant, I wish you a good one, in which much love abounds, worship to the great God is true and genuine, and spiritual edification and growth is known and experienced.
Watcher to HerbalMama wrote: If I had a quarter for every time I asked someone to explain where I was in error and they said almost exactly the same thing you just said, I could retire somewhere...not so expensive. Nonetheless, this is a forum and we still have a semblance of free speech here so I will bow out again not understanding where I am in error.
Bro, some will just argue for the sake of argument, not knowing what it is they are arguing for or against. These people are called argumentative. When you ask them nicely, "Please point out my error," they cannot.
Be assured that there are others on forum who will certainly point out what they call your "errors", but in reality, you are only "in error" because you say things that they disagree with. In other words "they" are the standard, they and they alone hold the truth, and everyone else is a heretic. Years ago, this happened often between the Baptists and Presbyterians. Thankfully, that has calmed down quite a lot, as people realised that distinctives do not prove a person's profession, and we have to get to know people individually, and sort out the wheat from the tares. God's elect have a fragrance, because they are indwelt by Christ.
Watchmanrem wrote: Come on John...đ The disagreement is that all claim the same as you. Of coarse Jesus is your shepherd!Absolutely . You know thats not what i was referring too... you know we are in agreement to this whole thing. But was referring too the simplicity of your idea. All would claim what you wrote. Where i would start is where and who taught the dispensationalsim idea. Doctrine of men. You second go was great.đđ
You disagree that the Lord is my Shepherd? Well, that's okay. Your disagreement does not change the facts.
My claim is that although God was speaking to his people (the Jews) in the OT, it is clear that the actual people of God are children of Abraham in the spiritual not physical sense, and that Christ himself is the seed of Abraham, making all Christians children of God, whether they be Jew, Gentile, or anything else. Thusly, the expression "replacement" is incorrect, and shows a lack of understanding of what many of us believe.
Thusly, the promises of God to the Jews (a new heart will I give you, etc.) become the promises of God to the elect of God, irrespective of whether or not they are Jew or Gentile. All are one in Christ Jesus - not replacement but fulfilment.
Watchmanrem wrote: They call us replacement, the reformers were replacement deceivers they SAY..
What is needful is to study scripture with the help of the Spirit, and see how God has pictured the new covenant in the OT, thereby making, say, the psalms, most relevant to all men in all generations, living in either the old covenants or the new covenant.
Thusly, I can say (for myself)....
"The Lord is my Shepherd, I shall not want." Ps 23:1
Mike wrote: The subject of seat belts brought a reminder. It would save many more lives if the speed limit were reduced to 15 mph. Thousands every year in the US alone. Otherwise wouldnât it be better to remain indoors, where we are safe distanced from people driving 55? But for some reason the vast majority of drivers donât drive in fear of losing their lives. Why is that, and why is no governing authority concerned over this unnecessary loss of life on the highway? Youâd think living life is more important than just breathing air. Callous.
Exactly Mike. If you had the power, you would reduce the speed limit, sure you would. Or maybe increase it? Our 70mph maximum speed limit (which means 80mph) could do with reducing to 45mph, thereby reducing deaths on the road. Even better, let us make illegal these ridiculously high speeds of trains and taxis and airplanes, and get back to donkeys such as Jesus used. That would reduce deaths by about 99.9%.
As for the pandemic, I believe that if no measures had been taken by any country in the world, around half the world would have eventually tested positive, and deaths increased to 160 million.
Frank wrote: Yes brother, he sure is a character. And if he is able to post thoughts on this site, then he is of course responsible for those thoughts.
He sure is a character bro. Oh it made me larf! Not so much because it was funny, but simply the fact that he seemed to be quite serious in his answer to a very good question. Mind you bro, it might have been a little too deep for him, although I caught the sense of it straight away.
I wonder if John Yurich regards the taking of the Holy Communion in the RCC as necessary for salvation? If not, why is it a negative to be excommunicated from the RCC?
Yes, it was quite a night, but I did get some sleep, and the news in the early hours caused me to rejoice with great rejoicing.
Frank wrote: Well John, it has been a while since you posted frequently on the forum. Because of that I am going to ask you a question that will allow those who donât know you to know where you stand. What would be the spiritual negative if someone was excommunicated from the catholic church?
John Yurich USA wrote: According to Catholic teaching the spiritual negative of being excommunicated from the Catholic Church is that one can't receive Holy Communion.
Adriel wrote: 1tim 2:2 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; 2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.â So Christians have already been praying for President Trump. AND Will keep doing so because GOD has commanded us to. May the Lord have mercy upon President Trump and his wife and family. We pray for a safe recovery. Amen. Regardless of all politics.
It is a most wonderful thing that any child of God can pray to God, being a priest of the Most High by adoption and able to come into his presence by the blood of the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
I find that it helps to see people as spirits, travelling around in an outer casing called the body. The spirit does not have a size or age, so ignoring the outer casing helps to see the real person within.
The Quiet Christian wrote: Brother John, we're already there. Most of us don't pay attention.
Quiet Brother, quite so.
I remember when I was attending a 1689 Baptist church in Devon, I befriended a lovely Down's Syndrome teenager, who was the son of the elder and his wife. He was a remarkable person, very loving and very loveable. Everyone got on with him, and he was a joy to be with. He was aloof from the world, and hadn't gotten that coldness that comes from distrust. It was from him that I realised there is something quite special about those people, having seen it in many others whom I've met over the years.
Chrisgp from England wrote: It is the terrible fear of this disease that has saddened me...
Chris, thank you so much for your response. I know you are a thinking man and Christian brother, and I am sure I would enjoy fellowship with you.
I am also sure, from what you have said in the past, that you have been to several different countries. Did you not have to endure travel injections, to inoculate you against catching diseases which we know nothing of in this country? Like malaria etc. I very much doubt that you had a crippling fear of catching malaria, rather you took precautions, as advised by guvs either end of the journey. Is this not so? Why then do you refer to taking precautionary measures against C19 (common sense measures) as irrational fear? Or are you referring to the unregenerate, who all their lives are crippled by a fear of death?
Hebrews 2:15 KJV (15)Â And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
Chrisgp from England wrote: No, John UK I am not full of fear, I think you are.
It depends Chris on what sort of fear you are talking about. Let me show you what I have in Christ Jesus:
2 Timothy 1:7 KJV (7)Â For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
So I am filled with power, love, and a sound mind. I have no fear, yet you say I have fear. Of what do you say I am afraid?
You are the one who is always grumbling about not being able to have fellowship because the guv has ruled it out. Yet I have not missed one week of fellowship, even though I take risks to do so. You are the one who is always grumbling about this, that, and the other. Yet I am still actively involved in the evangelisation of the world and putting my life on the line, that others might hear the gospel and be saved.
Or are you talking about a healthy fear, which compels you to keep your kitchen clean lest you attract unwanted bugs there, or whatever.
Healthy fear means you wear a seatbelt in your car. Is it a fear of being fined for noncompliance, or a fear of going through the windscreen if you have a head on smash? Do you maintain your air bags?