The Quiet Christian wrote:
So if children survive their mothers' wombs and then the initial natal care, they are to be sexualized and turned into the way of destruction.

Michael Hranek wrote:
Wow!
I don't know exactly how God will handle this in His Divine Providenc and Sovereignty
BUT If it comes to it, think of the opportunity for prison ministry

Acts 16:27 KJV
(27)  And the keeper of the prison awaking out of his sleep, and seeing the prison doors open, he drew out his sword, and would have killed himself, supposing that the prisoners had been fled.

Acts 16:28-31 KJV
(28)  But Paul cried with a loud voice, saying, Do thyself no harm: for we are all here.
(29)  Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas,
(30)  And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
(31)  And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.

BELIEVE ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, AND THOU SHALT BE SAVED, AND THY HOUSE.

Watcher wrote:
Thank you, brother.

cv wrote:
This is going to drag on unnecessarily.
I will say that when you jump in and affirm something, and later revise/clear it up, the point being made is lost. This is something I keep running up with you.

I do hope the above edifies you and blesses your heart and gives you a better way forward in debating the points made by other people.

If you think something I have written is incorrect, please quote me and show me where my error is (according to YOUR standard, and I accept that you have a standard), and I will answer you according to MY standard (and I hope you accept that I have a standard).

Example:

"when you jump in and affirm something, and later revise/clear it up" you said.

cv wrote:
1. Are YOU the standard instead?

2. Watcher posts start with an absolute obedience to government, no exceptions. And you abet.

3. THAT IS AN ERROR!. The bible demonstrates both!

1. Certainly not! And I hope you can also say, "Certainly not!"

2. Incorrect, as the following post by myself shows: 10/3/2020 4.22AM

"The 'obey/disobey your government' is a big debate, and some parts of scripture say to obey, other parts to disobey in certain circumstances."

3. Quite so. And if you read all my posts, including the one above, you will see my position on that.

Thank you for showing an interest in my spiritual welfare. It is a very rare thing these days for Christian brethren and sisters to have a genuine concern for their fellows.

Watchmanrem wrote:
With this new age of social credit score. To live. Coz i am broke. The recieved text only.

Watcher to HerbalMama wrote:
If I had a quarter for every time I asked someone to explain where I was in error and they said almost exactly the same thing you just said, I could retire somewhere...not so expensive. Nonetheless, this is a forum and we still have a semblance of free speech here so I will bow out again not understanding where I am in error.

Watchmanrem wrote:
Come on John...�
The disagreement is that all claim the same as you. Of coarse Jesus is your shepherd!Absolutely . You know thats not what i was referring too... you know we are in agreement to this whole thing.
But was referring too the simplicity of your idea.
All would claim what you wrote.
Where i would start is where and who taught the dispensationalsim idea. Doctrine of men. You second go was great.👍�

Mike wrote:
Good to see you still have a sense of humor, John�

Watchmanrem wrote:
Sorry John i have to disagree.

My claim is that although God was speaking to his people (the Jews) in the OT, it is clear that the actual people of God are children of Abraham in the spiritual not physical sense, and that Christ himself is the seed of Abraham, making all Christians children of God, whether they be Jew, Gentile, or anything else. Thusly, the expression "replacement" is incorrect, and shows a lack of understanding of what many of us believe.

Thusly, the promises of God to the Jews (a new heart will I give you, etc.) become the promises of God to the elect of God, irrespective of whether or not they are Jew or Gentile. All are one in Christ Jesus - not replacement but fulfilment.

If you disagree - fine.

Watchmanrem wrote:
They call us replacement, the reformers were replacement deceivers they SAY..

Thusly, I can say (for myself)....

Mike wrote:
The subject of seat belts brought a reminder. It would save many more lives if the speed limit were reduced to 15 mph. Thousands every year in the US alone. Otherwise wouldn’t it be better to remain indoors, where we are safe distanced from people driving 55? But for some reason the vast majority of drivers don’t drive in fear of losing their lives. Why is that, and why is no governing authority concerned over this unnecessary loss of life on the highway? You’d think living life is more important than just breathing air. Callous.

Frank wrote:
Yes brother, he sure is a character. And if he is able to post thoughts on this site, then he is of course responsible for those thoughts.

I wonder if John Yurich regards the taking of the Holy Communion in the RCC as necessary for salvation? If not, why is it a negative to be excommunicated from the RCC?

Frank wrote:
Well John, it has been a while since you posted frequently on the forum. Because of that I am going to ask you a question that will allow those who don’t know you to know where you stand.
What would be the spiritual negative if someone was excommunicated from the catholic church?

John Yurich USA wrote:
According to Catholic teaching the spiritual negative of being excommunicated from the Catholic Church is that one can't receive Holy Communion.

Adriel wrote:
1tim 2:2 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;
2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.
3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.“
So Christians have already been praying for President Trump.
AND Will keep doing so because GOD has commanded us to.
May the Lord have mercy upon President Trump and his wife and family. We pray for a safe recovery. Amen.
Regardless of all politics.

The Quiet Christian wrote:
Brother John, we're already there. Most of us don't pay attention.

Chrisgp from England wrote:
It is the terrible fear of this disease that has saddened me...

I am also sure, from what you have said in the past, that you have been to several different countries. Did you not have to endure travel injections, to inoculate you against catching diseases which we know nothing of in this country? Like malaria etc. I very much doubt that you had a crippling fear of catching malaria, rather you took precautions, as advised by guvs either end of the journey. Is this not so? Why then do you refer to taking precautionary measures against C19 (common sense measures) as irrational fear? Or are you referring to the unregenerate, who all their lives are crippled by a fear of death?

ladybug wrote:
....not sure what 'healthy fear' is, for no fear is 'healthy'.

Chrisgp from England wrote:
No, John UK I am not full of fear, I think you are.

2 Timothy 1:7 KJV
(7)  For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

So I am filled with power, love, and a sound mind. I have no fear, yet you say I have fear. Of what do you say I am afraid?

You are the one who is always grumbling about not being able to have fellowship because the guv has ruled it out. Yet I have not missed one week of fellowship, even though I take risks to do so. You are the one who is always grumbling about this, that, and the other. Yet I am still actively involved in the evangelisation of the world and putting my life on the line, that others might hear the gospel and be saved.

Or are you talking about a healthy fear, which compels you to keep your kitchen clean lest you attract unwanted bugs there, or whatever.