|
|
USER COMMENTS BY DUH! |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 5 · Found: 212 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
2/14/14 5:17 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
All 5 points wrote: .. Yeah know, this is hard to apply to such a vast nation and Continent and it won't work in the U.S Europe either. Maybe that's the plan. Whose? Ephes.6:12 Or maybe the poor fellows from the so called 2nd reformation that you admire misunderstood the Lord's plan for the churches! After all they got church government wrong. |
|
|
2/14/14 3:38 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Bible Tulip wrote: Where you get this "divine" attribute by the sinner to "agree with God" about sin and his hopelessness, when man cannot even discern spiritually is beyond Bible doctrine. You give to man what is not in him to know or use without divine help. Why are you on here trying to convince anyone about anything?! Are you a closet Arminian? |
|
|
2/13/14 12:41 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Biblical Presbyterianism wrote: But don't forget Michael there are many who call Him Lord, Lord and cannot really mean it. Roman Catholics, Arminians, Free willers, Wesleyans et al Cannot be Elect of a Sovereign God. They haven't received the truth of T.U.L.I.P. and obviously come up with fallacy instead of Bible doctrine. So the "people of God" are a particular people whom God and Christ "know" (Mat 7:23) and know them to be Holy and His own. Jesus states::- John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: 28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. 29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. 30 I and my Father are one. Regarding this article and "Christians reject idea of waiting for marriage" (adultery) - These are nominal Christian and probably come from Arminian style churches. Remember Get Calvinism or Get Lost!!! You're going to get a real shock when your pride excludes you and humble Arminians get to heaven. |
|
|
2/11/14 6:10 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Answer to John UK from Calvin's Institutes:"Baptism serves as our confession before men, inasmuch as it is a mark by which we openly declare that we wish to be ranked among the people of God, by which we testify that we concur with all Christians in the worship of one God, and in one religion; by which, in short, we publicly assert our faith, so that not only do our hearts breathe, but our tongues also, and all the members of our body, in every way they can, proclaim the praise of God. In this way, as is meet, everything we have is made subservient to the glory of God, which ought everywhere to be displayed, and others are stimulated by our example to the same course.... Paul says to the Galatians, “As many of you as have been baptised into Christ have put on Christ” (Gal. 3:27). Why so? That they might thereafter live to Christ, to whom previously they had not lived. And though, in adults, the receiving of the sign ought to follow the understanding of its meaning, yet, as will shortly be explained, a different rule must be followed with Children...." Of course he would say a different rule must be followed with Children, because he wanted to make them part of the church and since he viewed baptism as an initiatory rite, they had to have it to be part of the church! |
|
|
2/11/14 4:39 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
By the Book wrote: I have presented ALL the Biblical arguments on the Covenant of Grace which God made everlasting, and how circumcision is the precursor to baptism, and the establishment of these points from the NT. All you did was present malice, hate and contempt. As a Christian I don't want to exhibit that side of Baptist ideology on the threads again. You should read Calvin's institutes and the section on Baptism. You might be surprised at his unchristian attitude to those who didn't agree with him. In fact the scorn and derision you exhibit is typical of his writings too. So please do me a favor and quit the sanctimonious attitude. |
|
|
2/8/14 7:11 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Unprofitable Servant wrote: You ditch the God of the Bible, note you have NO answer to the fact that songs in Scripture are not all from the book of Psalms except to say you have disdain for the version I used. The largest proof we have against your pernicious ways is that Scripture plainly teaches God resists the proud. Yet you take great pride that, in your thinking, you are in an elevated status for your inaccurate interpretation over those who don't hold it. If you really followed Christ and the Bible, you would show brokenness that there are those who are being (in your thinking) mislead, instead you make false accusations and snarky remarks. Your response to a post that is filled with Scripture, is "which other parts of the Word of God do you ditch",while at the same time rejecting all the Scripture that was posted. He's a Presby and can only receive "Scripture truth" as he calls it, second hand. He knows no Bible. He's happy that way. |
|
|
2/5/14 10:38 AM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
B.Rith wrote: The water is symbolic - NOT ACTUAL in the ceremony. "Gen 17:7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee." By rejecting the command of God and HIS Covenantal precepts you are rejecting the Mediator of the Covenant of God also. Congratulations! You get the dumbest post of the decade award! |
|
|
2/4/14 6:51 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John for JESUS wrote: Since God commanded the Jews to be baptized for the remission of sins, wasn't it required by Jesus to obey Him in order to remain righteous? If Jesus didn't obey God, wouldn't that have been a sin? Therefore making Jesus unrighteous. How could it have been required of Jesus 'as a Jew' when he himself was not a sinner? What sins did he have that needed remission? |
|
|
2/4/14 6:17 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Biblical Christian wrote: Seems like some who hold to "infant baptism" still have the rags of Romanism clinging to them and they have never read the book of Galations or don't comprehend it They are specially trained from a very young age NOT to understand the NT, because they insist that they must have the veil of Moses over their eyes, in case the light of the NT should break through and blind them! |
|
|
2/4/14 3:36 PM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
All 5 points wrote: John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. 6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. 7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. 8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit. 9 Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be? 10 Jesus answered and said unto him, Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things? 11 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness. 12 If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? Where's baptism here? |
|
|
2/4/14 10:51 AM |
Duh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
B.Rith wrote: "Rom 15:8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision FOR THE TRUTH of God, to CONFIRM the PROMISES made unto the FATHERS" The PROMISES made unto the Fathers, not covenant! Why? Because the covenant is the New Covenant, not the Old! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|