Dave wrote:
Well peanut brained jelly leg government, leased our northern port of Darwin, 99years. oh and slight oversight, we decided not to tell the USA until the Chinese came sailing into Darwin. What a bunch of nongs!
Under a month later and its panic stations now trying to build pour armed force's up to meet China once of aggression, and the Chinese are arrogant enough to have a go at our PM because China don't think Australia has a right to expand it's fighting capabilities!
C'mon guy's ww3 here, things are more precarious than ever in the world stage,
Someone asks will China start ww3 , no they won't, it's been decreed by God. China,Russia and even Turkey will soon be allies, Turkey is cranky with Russia, but they'll flip sides soon enough..
And what an announcement " Russia and USA come to peace deal on Syria? " in my life time we've been to war many times by proxy with Russia,
Come quickly Lord

'A warning to America and Israel from an ex-Muslim'

Jim Lincoln wrote:
Because the KJV is a Catholic Bible, q

Therefore the RC church is the truth if millions have been converted through er,um, ....this RC bible filled with false doctrine? SermonAudio is also part of the same seeing though it is based on the Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster and America and strongly Traditional Text?

Next you'll be saying it is a JW Bible because they once used it (when the whole of Christendom still used the same, hence even the cults). Wonder why they abandoned the KJV

I'll try and help you...have a look at my sermon comment here where JW's are convicted through a scripture not their NWT or in your own bible:

http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=4714516552

Observer wrote:
What will it take to push you over the edge? Lol
You know a few months ago no one cared about a flag, until some stupid liberal stood up and alleged its connection to racism then all the liberals were up in arms.
Same with Jim. His "experts" say be upset about the KJV and suddenly Jimbo's apoplectic with concern and wants it buried.

AV is really a niche Bible for Shakespearean actors 1/17/11

The Devil has been using the AV for 400 years, it's time to give a clear message 1/15/11

If Satan were to choose which Bible he preferred it would definitely be the AV! 1/15/11

Alas Jim is already babbling to himself as he looks in the mirror, and he should be ashamed when he answers how did God convert many 1,000's at the Baptist Metropolitan Tabernacle using the (anglican) KJV (The Devil's bible)?

Have a look and be ashamed
Tabernacle Conversions in 1860

http://metropolitantabernacle.org/Christian-article/Tabernacle-Conversions-in-1860

From The Sword & Trowel 2014, issue 2 by Church Elders, 1860

Observer wrote:
The issue really is whether God has preserved his word historically

RE: J MacArthur, possibly he could handle grave concerns better-view the correspondence with a preacher on SermonAudio re: 'the Manhatton Declaration'-MacArthur's Disturbing Reply

http://www.pccmonroe.org/2010/02.24.htm

Church History can be most relevant. Read the KJV 2 Thess 2: 7. Read the same in the Geneva version and examine the notes. Read again the dedication in the KJV. See the WCF 25.6 and LBC 1689. The KJV is a PROTESTANT Bible. Now read the NKJV-note the subtle CAPITAL change and alteration altogether of the Protestant Geneva interpretation held by so many faithful preachers-Bunyan, Whitefield, Spurgeon.

Now read the General Editor of the Enlish Standard Version and does the alarm bell sound? Another one behind the same Manhatton Declaration...a must read

J I Packer and ‘Mother’ Teresa

http://www.takeheed.info/news-from-the-front-march-2010/

US Reformed (see sermons on SermonAudio above) Baptist Pastor Jeff Riddle’s blog (link below) is worth a look as he is doing some excellent scholarly work defending the Textus Receptus position and critiquing even James White.

Interesting to see Dr James White’s response to Reformed Baptist Pastor Robert Truelove and Truelove's response to him. See Robert’s video ‘Ecclesiastical Text-Response to James White’, but first go to the end of it at 57.45. Note the comment about some of James White’s disciple’s as rabid critical text advocates, similar to the KJO Ruckmanites. Both types appear on SA comments, so a well received loving rebuke!
http://www.jeffriddle.net/

Jeff would differ a little with RT

WM # 40: Rejoinder to James White on Ecclesiastical Text, http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=72515106142

see also:
WM #28: Life and Legacy of Bruce Manning Metzger
WM # 29: James White, Luke 23:34, the PA, and Muslim Apologetics

As Pastor Riddle says: there is a small but growing movement to rethink the adoption of the modern critical text!