Michael Hranek wrote:
Mark M.
If I may make a comment about the last part of your sentence, "that is not for me to judge." I believe Satan has wickedly influenced Christians to be "Non-judgmental" to such a degree "Evangelical" society will condemn you and denounce you if you actually expose and warn people of popular false teachers.
As a consequence of this "non-judgmentalism" present day churches are like cities without walls (no protection whatsoever) and Satan and his false teachers can come right in, set up shop, and lead many into destruction and hell if not both and many times I have to believe the stern and severe discipline of God upon His disobedient children for having joined themselves together with unbelievers.
If we love Jesus Christ and follow Him it might not make us popular in "Evangelical" circles to put out those who have turned the Father's house into a place of merchandise and money changing but then isn't it more important that we passionately love our Savior who shed His blood for us than the comfort and ease "non-judgmentalism" gives us in this wicked and perverse generation?

"...for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name."

God says that His word is pure. Pure means PURE. Exact, perfect, inerrant, not one shred of an error.

"The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times."

"Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him."

God says that He shall keep His Word for every generation and language.

"Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."

"For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven."

"Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away."

jille wrote:
Here is a little history on the Geneva Bible; the Puritans, Pilgrims, Calvinists, and those belonging to the Reformation all used the Geneva Bible, which went out of print in 1644. Why did it go out of print? Because King James I of England desired to deny people the marginal notes found in the Geneva Bible. He ordered that a translation be made of the bible {w/o the margin notes many loved from the Geneva}, and only to be used in all churches of England in time of divine service. King James' background is somewhat suspect, the entire article may be found and read at www.genevabible.org,

hidemi williges wrote:
Is it a coincidence that with the proliferation of so-called new versions of the bible; that the spiritual wellness of the world is declining rapidly. It seems to me that it is those who are tainted by worldliness and modernism that claim the KJV to be in error. If you read the history of the men who promote the manuscripts that underlie the modern versions, would you still condone their sin and ignorance? Concerning Bible versions, if the KJV is error prone and archaic, and examining the newer versions which all contradict one another in numerous places, then why should I have confidence in any Bible? No wonder the generation of today don't read the Bible.

Most people have no idea that Graham is a puppet of Rome and its ecumencal agenda.

Jim Lincoln wrote "Engineer, all I really need to point out, that the KJV is wrong in at least 5,000 places"

"The WORDS of the LORD are PURE WORDS: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. THOU SHALT KEEP THEM, O LORD, THOU SHALT PRESERVE THEM from this generation for ever."

Now you tell me, if these verses are true, and they are, do you think God would have any errors in His Word? Can God do anything wrong or false? NO. THere is not one millioneth of a shred of any error in Him. Neither is there in His written Word that He preserved for every language and generation. If God is responsible for the preservation, then this means that He did not leave it up to erring men to correctly translate His Word for every generation, and we have as perfect of a translation of the Bible in every language today as the original manuscripts.

GG wrote:
Yea...the Book of Common Sense...God gave me that one in person.

GG wrote:
No where in the bible does the bible say that the bible is all that is needed for teaching...

GG wrote:
Pile It: If the Church of Rome didn't start until 325 ad, then of whom is St Ignatius of Antioch speaking in his "Letter To The Smyrnaeans [circa 110 ad]", "Wherever the Bishop appears, let the people be there; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the 'CATHOLIC CHURCH'".

Lance Eccles wrote:
If you were "converted" by a Chick tract, you certainly can't claim to be saved. Quite the opposite.

You are not born again, because you believe a different gospel with a false christ, which is not according to the Scripture. If you were, you would leave your institution immediately, and stop promoting the nonsense, because it is in opposition to God's Word.

VA Reader wrote:
I was a catholic and I asked for the truth and God heard me and answered me with John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him"I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by me." I came out of all that was stated above, and was made free from bondage of unbelief through Jesus alone.

John D. wrote:
How did you conclude the Authorised Bible translators rejected the Apocrypha as divine? I don't have my 1611 in front of me; is that in the notes somewhere? and if so, where?

DJC49 wrote:
GG wrote:
I worship the real God in spirit, not some obnoxious Prots notion of a false one.
Right!
And His central attribute would be ... what, GG?

Sounds like biblical truth don't you think? NOT

sandrajean wrote:
I was raised and educated a roman catholic and remained one for 39 years until I started reading scripture and slowly but surely realized much of what I had been taught was contrary to what the bible teaches.
I am a born again child of God and I thank him for lifting me out of the miry pit of Rome and setting my feet upon the rock of his word.

Shofar wrote:
just invoke Matthew 10:14....
"And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet".

"But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself."

"Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."

And

Lance Eccles wrote:
to help us achieve salvation.

"For we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another.But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;"

" Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight:

"Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:"

"To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus."

"Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt."

"But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness."