John UK wrote:
I recommend you do your own Bible Study, with your own personal Bible, with the Holy Ghost being your helper, instead of relying so much on the words of human beans. Oh, and if you don't know which of the 150 English Versions to choose from, let me assist you. Get a.......
KING JAMES BIBLE

kenny wrote:
Jim, your disdain for God's Word is frightening. The statements you have made on SA about the Scriptures are horribly misguided.

Serious Christian wrote:
The text put together by Westcott and Hort IS USED by 'most' of the modern versions. Which was used as the basis for the ERV!

KJV says;

Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

"He does not believe in limited atonement, but believes that Christ died for all. After hearing this great Biblical error, can I trust everything else he says? Any feedback?"

GG wrote:
The supposed "High Profile" Catholic politicians are certainly NOT Catholic.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
This --conservative-- body of Lutherans, at least know enough to open up the Bible when making decisions especially since [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=92807123612]]]The Bible Says Homosexuality is Sin[/URL].

DisplacedMaritimer (Bert) wrote:
many passages in Scripture tell us that we must back our faith up with works.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
Tony, the AV is copyrighted or I should say the same idea, in Great Britain. So, you are wrong there. I have "proved" what I said from such articles, by a noted theologian,

John Paul wrote:
Someone, please help me with my confusion. If the Dutch translators translated the dutch bible from the English KJV 1611, is it a valid translation? Are we Dutch using the wrong version? Should I purchase a dutch bible translated from the KJV, and if so, can anyone give me a British Publishing House that has done this. I wouldn't trust an American one because American English is different from British English.

john paul wrote:
Someone, please help me with my confusion. If the Dutch translators translated the dutch bible from the English KJV 1611, is it a valid translation? Are we Dutch using the wrong version? Should I purchase a dutch bible translated from the KJV, and if so, can anyone give me a British Publishing House that has done this. I wouldn't trust an American one because American English is different from British English. Can anyone also point me to a Dispensational Dutch Bible and a Reformed Dutch bible so that I can compare the two for accuracy.

TT wrote:
Watch out, Tony. You sound like the Muslims only reading the Koran in Arabic. Maybe you need to go back to the Greek and Hebrew; the King James was only translated in the 1600's. Or Catholics might say go back to the Latin. The King James is an excellent, trustworthy translation, and I don't care for some of the new translations either (I like New King James myself; the trustworthy translation without the archaic language). But jjjj is right; this is the word of God, nonetheless.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
I think he used the wrong term, guardian demon would be more accurate.