John Yurich USA wrote: My real name is not John Yurich and I will not reveal my real name on here or anywhere else. My Baptist Pastor will not contact you.
Doesnât need to know your real name. How many people private messaged him telling him they would not make Easter Sunday service because they will be attending mass! He should know exactly who you are, that is if your not a liar. Any pastor who does not wish to discuss a members misbehavior when addressed is not a real pastor but a hireling.
Been Watching wrote: Then obviously God will use the standard of your church to judge everyone on the day of Judgement. If someone is accepted at your church as saved, then they must be saved in spite of what they write on forums. I should contact Pastor Steve and ask if he would like to spend some time discussing you. I assume the phone number is on the website? Update: I got in touch with your church just now and am waiting for your pastor to get back to me. We will see if this is all true, and whether or not something can be done to bring you into accountability.
Good job! I was thinking of doing this myself since John says he doesnât listen to anyone but his baptist pastor. Just remember to mention about how John admittedly attends church at a place that according to him has a false Gospel and the Bible says let them be accursed and how John has told us that the doctrine of election was a satanic lie according to pastor Steve and how John comes on here constantly being divisive. Thanks
If John is real maybe someone from the congregation can donate him an old computer so he can get a job.
John Yurich USA wrote: I learned how to navigate through Microsoft Office Suite 2010. The Data Entry work I am looking into doing is called Data Entry work from home. But I will be doing it at the library on their computer.
So you want to do personal data entry on a public library computer? You donât think that will be a data security problem? Do you type? Most data entry jobs require so many words per minute typing sufficiency.
Here is a link with an article with links to data entry jobs from home and what you should do to get a job in that position:
John Yurich USA wrote: I am researching becoming a freelance online Data Entry Operator and do the Data Entry work online at the library. My Baptist Pastor is not a hireling because he preaches the biblical Gospel of salvation every Sunday in his sermons.
Talk is cheap John and for the last few years you have been saying the same thing and doing nothing about it. Googling jobs isnât gonna help. You need to make a resume, make a LinkedIn account and start applying for jobs. You do nothing all day so take some free online classes there are a ton out there absolutely free! Here is one:
They have free classes for data entry and how to use Microsoft office (the newest version). You can do something with your life or just come on here all day being divisive. Your 56 and you live in a room paid for by the state living on handouts and how are you gonna support a family if you are unwilling to work or at least start to get the education you need to get a job in the future? Sign up for one of these classes so you have what it even takes to get a data entry job!
John Yurich USA wrote: I will marry a woman who is at least 30 years younger than I am. The kids will be spread out over 12 years. I may adopt some children as babies to add to the 8 natural born children for a total of 12 children.
When are you planning on doing all this? You rent a room in someoneâs house and are 56 and that is probably paid for by tax money, you arenât even trying to find a job! You spend all of your time on here being decisive which is a sin. You say that you know the Catholic Church preaches another gospel and Godâs word says let them be accursed yet you keep going to mass. You say the Catholic Church worships the biblical and historical Jesus but the Jesus they worship becomes a cracker works salvation through the hands of âpriestsâ and accepts heathen repetitive prayer and doesnât mind associating with idolaters. Grow up get a job and be happy with what you have. You should of thanked saved sinner for his offer but all you do is come on here to be decisive. Your pastor is a hireling from what you told me he has said in the past. You donât go to a Baptist church if the word baptist is nowhere on the sign or the website. You go to a nondenominational church.
Watcher wrote: Zachariah's ethnicity is sinner, plain and simple. We bear the brunt of white man's greed even here in Canada. Most of the Indians here hate white man, and it's something that has trailed behind them for generations. It's very similar to how Arabs regard Jews. There's a hate-on that even they cannot explain. All Zachariah can say is they killed everyone they came across so we should do the same. The same story rings true here. The local Indians here want nothing more than to hate and discriminate against us even though they rebuke white man in times past for doing the same. Hypocrisy all around, and nothing will change or heal until someone lets it go and forgives.
Exactly. Zechariah is just like the people he despises itâs strange how that works out. Every single group Iâve read about in history has taken advantage of power itâs the fallen human condition to do so itâs not just white man. Itâs strange he is so mad at America when it was Spain who conquered the tribes in Mexico. The Americans just stole the land from Spain who stole it from Aztecs who stole it from conquering smaller tribes and so on.
Jon wrote: Goodbye to all of you Calvinists and KJV only folks. I have been agonizing in prayer and studying much on these issues and come to the conclusion that I flatly reject Calvinism and KJV only, and that I am much more doctrinally in line with the Wesleyan/Arminiani tradition. Therefore I cannot waste any more of my time on this site and will be deleting the app. There is coming a great shaking wherein all that can be shaken will be, and only the truth and good will remain. We will all know then what is true and good. Farewell
Take care their Jon. I wouldnât follow Wesley either he was a liar, false witness who misrepresented Augustus Toplady and tried to undue his work by putting out false statement attributed to Toplady and was a heretic which taught Christian perfectionism. Look it up! Best just to follow the Bible and not after the traditions of man!
Zechariah what is your ethnicity? Spain conquered the Aztec empire and took the land from the triple alliance aka the Aztec empire and set up Ranchos up and down California by land grants to powerful Spanish colonist. The land was taken from the Spanish by America. So if you are a Native American meaning you were Aztec or some of the other major groups that were native to North America then you should be upset at Spain. If you are Spanish in decent then you stole the land from the Aztec empire. If you are Aztec then you murdered and conquered other smaller lands and stole their lands as that is what the triple alliance did in Mexico and you are just as guilty of stealing land as the Spanish were. Chances are you very well might have Spanish blood as not only did the Spanish conquer the Aztecs but they interbred with the local tribes to form blood alliances to keep from revolutions by the natives. So guess what your ancestry did exactly what you are coming on here condemning and your comment show you have a murderous unregenerate heart and you are absolutely ignorant to the history of California. What is your ethnicity? I bet your ancestors are just as guilty as the Americans are of stealing land! But thatâs in the past. The children are not to pay for their fatherâs mistakes.
Just a Guy wrote: Do ya think he will respond?.......đđ
He never responds. He just comes on here and spouts off his garbage and goes into hiding. He talks about Pharisees yet he is the one who wants to establish his own RIGTHEOUSNESS which is of the Law just like the Pharisees. I think he just comes on here to bother the brethren, God forbid he ever lures away disciples after himself. Sad thing is his silly video has a whole bunch of views and even some likes! All the points he disagrees with are the points where the natural man loves to glory in. If I had a Facebook I would go and post some stuff on his page pointing out his error.
Lie Detector wrote: Just remember that the newborn you hold in your arms is as innocent, pure and blameless as the day is long. This is God's glory. Jesus himself said so (Matt 18).
Where is the verse in Matthew 18 that supports what you just claimed above? The way you just interpreted Matthew 18 was a joke, you just were a false witness to Jesus. Do you know what humble means? Your comments donât sound like it.
I watched your video
It was like watching a two year old smashing words together to make a sentence. If they speak not according to this word it is because their is no light in them? Why donât you stick around and discuss these issues instead of throwing a temper tantrum and storming off?
If we are so wrong shouldnât you reason with us from the scripture like Paul did in Acts? I donât think you are able to discuss the Bible seriously without looking absolutely silly. Cherry picking verses is not wise!
My personal opinion is your a Deceitful worker and are deluded and donât even know it. 2 Cor 11 matches you perfect! You are an example of how true the Bible is!
Version Information The 21st Century King James Version of the Holy Bible (KJ21ÂŽ) is an updating of the 1611 King James Version (KJV).
It is not a new translation, but a careful updating to eliminate obsolete words by reference to the most complete and definitive modern American dictionary, the Webster's New International Dictionary, Second Edition, unabridged. Spelling, punctuation, and capitalization have also been updated.
It is online and free! â The Bible version debate is not so much a KJV issue it is a Textus Receptus issue. The Textus Receptus is far more accurate as the Alexandrian Texts are heavily corrected. If older is better with manuscripts that are highly edited according to textual critics then which edition do you use and what is the date of those corrections?
Like John said there are some very informative documentaries about the subject such as: Lamp in The Dark
Lie detector sounds by your comment you are the personification of Catholic doctrine, the Council of Trent say(Its Catholic):
CANON IX. If any one shall say, that by faith alone the impious is justified; so as to mean that nothing else is required to co-operate in order unto obtaining the grace of justification, and that it is not in any respect necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema. (Council of Trent, Sixth Session , Decree concerning Justification [trans. Theodore Alois Buckley])
CANON 8 If anyone maintains that some are able to come to the grace of baptism by mercy but others through free will, which has manifestly been corrupted in all those who have been born after the transgression of the first man, it is proof that he has no place in the true faith. For he denies that the free will of all men has been weakened through the sin of the first man, or at least holds that it has been affected in such a way that they have still the ability to seek the mystery of eternal salvation by themselves without the revelation of God. The Lord himself shows how contradictory this is by declaring that no one is able to come to him...
Maybe read some and be informed before you make such comments.
Lurker wrote: There are two elements to the discussion that should be discussed separately: Divorce and remarriage. Drawing from memory about the verses under discussion; the Jews ask Jesus if a man could divorce for any reason. He answered No. Fornication/adultery is the only lawful reason and that is what the exception clause points to. Iow, adultery/fornication is a lawful reason to divorce. Or put another way, adultery/fornication is the exception to no divorce for any reason. Absent the exception, divorce and remarriage is considered adultery by both parties. That said, there is more to take into account.... In Romans 11 Paul speaks of remarriage as lawful after the death of a husband. And Paul speaks more... But I'll leave that to you and CV if you want. Hope this helps.
Thanks Lurker I would agree with what you said. There is also 1 Cor 7 which should be taken into account as well. The whole chapter is on divorce and marriage and has some answers to new converts as well when it pertains to marriage. There is a lot more to it but I see that a person who was the victim of adultry is free from his wife to marry. I donât have much desire to go on about this topic.
Maybe cv would like to discuss it more with someone.
If you donât understand Matthew 5:32 read Matthew 19:9
9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
The innocent party is free to Marry and is not an adulter as they are the person âexceptâ pertains to:
Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery
Here it is same words just reordered. I think this is pretty clear: Whosoever shall put away his wife and shall marry another committeth adultry except for fornication.
The whosoever shall marry her who is put away is addressing that there was a valid reason for putting her away and you will see she is still bound to her husband as whoever marries her commits adultry. The husband in the example is not an adulterer as the verse says whosoever shall put away his wife and Mary Another is an adulterer EXCEPT for fornication. The except part means they are not an adulter if they marry another if they put away the wife for adultry.
Thatâs about as clear as I can explain how I read this verse.
cv wrote: Cheating? In Mt19:32, The innocent wife that is being put away is being CAUSED to commit adultery by remarrying -because she is innocent. The person marrying her is also committing adultery. Except for FORNICATION, (whatever this is,) ALL remarriages (including the non cheating ones) are adulterous.
Cheating means adultry(fornication)these days doesnât it?
Iâm guessing you mean Matthew 5:32 (there is no Matthew 19:32).
Let me rewrite it by taking out the âsaving for the cause of fornicationâ and add it to the end if that helps. It would mean the same thing.
Matthew 5:32 32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, ....., CAUSETH HER to commit adultery: and whosoever shall MARY HER that is divorced COMMITETH ADULTRY. saving for the cause of fornication.
I just added it at the end unless you want to throw that whole part out. Now read just this part of the verse together:
saving for the cause of fornication,CAUSETH HER to commit adultery:
Iâm not quite sure how it says the innocent wife who is put away is caused to be an adulter as God said all who divorce WITHOUT fornication are adulterers. I donât think that verse says what you are reading it as. You are missing the âsavingâ which mean except.
Lurker wrote: Add to that the qualification for a pastor or deacon..... husband of one wife. Paul wasn't saying polygamists can't hold those offices for if that was his purpose then the obvious inference would be lay people can be polygamists. He was setting a higher standard then that of lay people. But the language would be contradictory and superfluous if there was no biblical cause for divorce. That said, I'm happily married 48 years so I have no dog in this fight but to defend the truth.
Iâd agree with you that in I believe it is in 2 Timothy that a pastor is to have one wife means married once. He is also to be beyond reproach in his household and outside his house. He is called to a high standard as not to bring shame to the Lord or his character to be called into question.