John Yurich USA wrote:
There are other members of my Baptist Church who attend other churches on Christmas and Easter like the Lutheran Church and Episcopal Church and my Baptist Pastor does not consider that misbehavior either.

Galatians 1:8-9

8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

John Yurich USA wrote:
My real name is not John Yurich and I will not reveal my real name on here or anywhere else. My Baptist Pastor will not contact you.

Been Watching wrote:
Then obviously God will use the standard of your church to judge everyone on the day of Judgement. If someone is accepted at your church as saved, then they must be saved in spite of what they write on forums. I should contact Pastor Steve and ask if he would like to spend some time discussing you. I assume the phone number is on the website?
Update: I got in touch with your church just now and am waiting for your pastor to get back to me. We will see if this is all true, and whether or not something can be done to bring you into accountability.

John Yurich USA wrote:
I learned how to navigate through Microsoft Office Suite 2010. The Data Entry work I am looking into doing is called Data Entry work from home. But I will be doing it at the library on their computer.

Here is a link with an article with links to data entry jobs from home and what you should do to get a job in that position:

John Yurich USA wrote:
I am researching becoming a freelance online Data Entry Operator and do the Data Entry work online at the library. My Baptist Pastor is not a hireling because he preaches the biblical Gospel of salvation every Sunday in his sermons.

https://www.edx.org/
https://www.lynda.com

John Yurich USA wrote:
I will marry a woman who is at least 30 years younger than I am. The kids will be spread out over 12 years. I may adopt some children as babies to add to the 8 natural born children for a total of 12 children.

Watcher wrote:
Zachariah's ethnicity is sinner, plain and simple. We bear the brunt of white man's greed even here in Canada. Most of the Indians here hate white man, and it's something that has trailed behind them for generations. It's very similar to how Arabs regard Jews. There's a hate-on that even they cannot explain. All Zachariah can say is they killed everyone they came across so we should do the same. The same story rings true here. The local Indians here want nothing more than to hate and discriminate against us even though they rebuke white man in times past for doing the same. Hypocrisy all around, and nothing will change or heal until someone lets it go and forgives.

Jon wrote:
Goodbye to all of you Calvinists and KJV only folks. I have been agonizing in prayer and studying much on these issues and come to the conclusion that I flatly reject Calvinism and KJV only, and that I am much more doctrinally in line with the Wesleyan/Arminiani tradition. Therefore I cannot waste any more of my time on this site and will be deleting the app. There is coming a great shaking wherein all that can be shaken will be, and only the truth and good will remain. We will all know then what is true and good. Farewell

Just a Guy wrote:
Do ya think he will respond?.......🙁🙁

Lie Detector wrote:
Just remember that the newborn you hold in your arms is as innocent, pure and blameless as the day is long. This is God's glory. Jesus himself said so (Matt 18).

I watched your video

It was like watching a two year old smashing words together to make a sentence. If they speak not according to this word it is because their is no light in them? Why don’t you stick around and discuss these issues instead of throwing a temper tantrum and storming off?

If we are so wrong shouldn’t you reason with us from the scripture like Paul did in Acts? I don’t think you are able to discuss the Bible seriously without looking absolutely silly. Cherry picking verses is not wise!

12 But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein THEY GLORY, they may be found even as we.

13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the MINISTERS OF RIGTHEOUSNESS; whose END shall be ACCORDING TO THEIR WORKS.

Got to be perfect for God to accept you lie detector:
Rom 10

3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish THEIR OWN RIGTHEOUSNESS, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

Rom 3

21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

22 Even the RIGTHEOUSNESS OF GOD which is BY FAITH OF JESUS CHRIST unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:

23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

24 Being justified FREELY by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

Christopher000 wrote:
Thanks Kev, hadn't even heard of it, but will take a look. I hope things have been good.

John UK wrote:
If you use the Received Text, you will have the KJV with modern words. But if you use the corrupted mss, you will have a whole different Bible which says different things.

YIA here is a good modern version for you:

https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/21st-Century-King-James-Version-KJ21-Bible/

Version Information
The 21st Century King James Version of the Holy Bible (KJ21®) is an updating of the 1611 King James Version (KJV).

It is not a new translation, but a careful updating to eliminate obsolete words by reference to the most complete and definitive modern American dictionary, the Webster's New International Dictionary, Second Edition, unabridged. Spelling, punctuation, and capitalization have also been updated.

It is online and free!
—
The Bible version debate is not so much a KJV issue it is a Textus Receptus issue. The Textus Receptus is far more accurate as the Alexandrian Texts are heavily corrected. If older is better with manuscripts that are highly edited according to textual critics then which edition do you use and what is the date of those corrections?

CANON IX. If any one shall say, that by faith alone the impious is justified; so as to mean that nothing else is required to co-operate in order unto obtaining the grace of justification, and that it is not in any respect necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema. (Council of Trent, Sixth Session [1547], Decree concerning Justification [trans. Theodore Alois Buckley])

CANON 8 If anyone maintains that some are able to come to the grace of baptism by mercy but others through free will, which has manifestly been corrupted in all those who have been born after the transgression of the first man, it is proof that he has no place in the true faith. For he denies that the free will of all men has been weakened through the sin of the first man, or at least holds that it has been affected in such a way that they have still the ability to seek the mystery of eternal salvation by themselves without the revelation of God. The Lord himself shows how contradictory this is by declaring that no one is able to come to him...

Lurker wrote:
There are two elements to the discussion that should be discussed separately: Divorce and remarriage.
Drawing from memory about the verses under discussion; the Jews ask Jesus if a man could divorce for any reason. He answered No. Fornication/adultery is the only lawful reason and that is what the exception clause points to. Iow, adultery/fornication is a lawful reason to divorce. Or put another way, adultery/fornication is the exception to no divorce for any reason.
Absent the exception, divorce and remarriage is considered adultery by both parties.
That said, there is more to take into account.... In Romans 11 Paul speaks of remarriage as lawful after the death of a husband. And Paul speaks more...
But I'll leave that to you and CV if you want. Hope this helps.

Matthew 19:9

9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

The innocent party is free to Marry and is not an adulter as they are the person “except” pertains to:

Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery

Here it is same words just reordered. I think this is pretty clear:
Whosoever shall put away his wife and shall marry another committeth adultry except for fornication.

The whosoever shall marry her who is put away is addressing that there was a valid reason for putting her away and you will see she is still bound to her husband as whoever marries her commits adultry. The husband in the example is not an adulterer as the verse says whosoever shall put away his wife and Mary Another is an adulterer EXCEPT for fornication. The except part means they are not an adulter if they marry another if they put away the wife for adultry.

That’s about as clear as I can explain how I read this verse.

Psalm 37
10 For yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be.

11 But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace.

12 The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth.

13 The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming.

cv wrote:
Cheating?
In Mt19:32, The innocent wife that is being put away is being CAUSED to commit adultery by remarrying -because she is innocent. The person marrying her is also committing adultery.
Except for FORNICATION, (whatever this is,) ALL remarriages (including the non cheating ones) are adulterous.

I’m guessing you mean Matthew 5:32 (there is no Matthew 19:32).

Let me rewrite it by taking out the “saving for the cause of fornication” and add it to the end if that helps. It would mean the same thing.

Matthew 5:32
32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, ....., CAUSETH HER to commit adultery: and whosoever shall MARY HER that is divorced COMMITETH ADULTRY.
saving for the cause of fornication.

I just added it at the end unless you want to throw that whole part out. Now read just this part of the verse together:

saving for the cause of fornication,CAUSETH HER to commit adultery:

9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, EXCEPT it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso MARRIETH HER which IS PUT AWAY doth commit adultery.

I’m pretty sure that all the part after the “except” only pertains to if one wasn’t cheated on. But the wife who is put away for adultery is still bound to her husband.

God divorced Israel and turned to the Gentiles so I’d say He was completely loosed from Israel to turn to another.

Here again you will see the only bound party is the one guilty of fornication which in the example is the wife. No mention of the husband sinning unless there was NO ADULTRY:

Matthew 5:31-32

31 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put AWAY HIS WIFE, let him give her a writing of divorcement:

32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, CAUSETH HER to commit adultery: and whosoever shall MARY HER that is divorced COMMITETH ADULTRY.