|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ JUST WONDERING ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 3 · Found: 113 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 3/22/13 4:28 PM |
| just wondering | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
jpw wrote:
Greatness comes from obedience to God, not national pride. A nation obedient to God, that loves truth and justice will be good because God is good. point taken, so, do you have anything positive to say about America, or any other nation, seeing no nation exist that would meet your definition of greatness and men by nature are in rebellion to God? |
|
|
| 3/22/13 10:25 AM |
| just wondering | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
jpw wrote:
they are openly drugging him, even said they drugged him to get the truth out of him. witnesses saw other things going on that day. this is not the america I once knew. been looking at a history of your posts, just wondering do you have anything positive to say about America? |
|
|
| 10/29/09 1:56 PM |
| Just wondering | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Neil wrote:
A surprising but fair question. See Prov. 11:13, 20:19. Secrecy implies privacy. Thank you. Those are good references.I generally agree that employers know far too much about their employees, though if I were to work for a Christian employer, I suppose I wouldn't mind so much. As it is, for now I work for one of the companies on this list. It seems to me that these big companies have all been co-opted by the same means that the same people used to take over nearly all the colleges and universities. First, they protested to get media coverage; next, the colleges / companies permit a token representative of the aggrieved group into some position; then that person gets more on board with them; then they move up through the ranks till they get a toehold in the board room; then it's all over. Once a small percentage of the colleges / companies has been taken over, the rest fall through media pressure. We're now at the stage where the 'minority' parties have become the majority in power, and the actual majority is being squeezed out by the less numerous but more powerful activists. Next comes the (actual, real, physical) persecution of those who disagree, I think. |
|
|
| 10/29/09 1:24 PM |
| Just wondering | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Neil wrote:
My private life is not my employer's business - he doesn't need to know who my wife is or how many children I have in order for me to work for him. Is privacy a Biblical concept? |
|
|
| 4/3/09 1:21 PM |
| just wondering | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Neil wrote:
Q: "Wonder why, it only says 'wife' and not 'husband'?"
A: If you're referring to Rom. 7:1-3 or 1 Cor 7:39, consider that the marriage bond is bilateral (1 Cor. 7:2-4) & penalties for breaking it apply to both sexes (Lev. 20:10), so there is no need for Paul to be pedantic there & describe the case for the opposite sex - it is implied. What you say is true, but I wonder if the deeper meaning is that the "wife" as in O.T. and representative of the positional relationship of Israel with God, and the "bride" or "wife" in the N.T., as representative of the Church and the positional relationship to Christ, is the greater meaning of the illustration. In almost every other directive in Scripture, it is given to the male, but, in this case, to the woman, or more correctly, the wife.Given that God, Himself, could never be unfaithful, and divorce Himself of His elect; however, the "wife" or "Israel" of the O.T. was terribly unfaithful, and the "wife" or "Church" of the N.T. was/has been/is unfaithful as a body as described in Revelation.
Just wondering. |
|
|
| 4/3/09 11:35 AM |
| just wondering | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
DJC49 wrote:
Check: 1Cor 7:8,9,39,40.
Remarriage upon the death of a spouse is sanctioned. So, what provision is made for the person who is remarried, but not as a widow? Does this affect that person's eternal destiny? Just a second look at those verses draws my attention to the mention of the "wife" being bound by law as long as her husband lives.
Wonder why, it only says "wife" and not "husband"? |
|
|
|
| Jump to Page : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/11/08 10:36 PM
