|
| Page 1 | Page 25 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
|  |
|
|
 12/21/16 1:29 PM |
| s c | | Oh | |  |  |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
If this is true "...Just because the Pope wants to play nice and bend words and say both worship the GOD of Abraham, doesn't mean Graham, my friend or myself believe it.It would be more convincing if Graham and others didn't speak otherwise.
Unless they lie,while they do speak out of both sides of their mouths,one cannot believe something to be and also speak against it. JY,many are not convinced that RCs are Christian (unless perhaps they are ignorant of the RC catechism) because of all of the numerous facts of the RCC which clearly shows them to be antichrist.
You and others choose to stay mum after the evidence is presented each time on this forum.
You cannot defend that which screams of deception. Even your blasphemous misrepresentations (crucifix/false images) scream "fake". |
|
|
| 12/19/16 10:50 PM |
| s c | | Oh | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Interesting mention of Galatians 4:4...
followed by: 9 But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? 10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. 11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain. ...not to mention a little liberty with following annual celebrations...there is no mention of them.
Observing something at the time of the actual event is a far cry from observing it annually. There are only a couple verses in Scripture which deal with those celebrating their birthdays and they're not good.
What we do know is that no one ever observed His Incarnation on a certain date in Scripture years after the event.
Pagans and Rcs,however,do celebrate "christmas". Is it all subjective? No wonder we have gender confusion.It's all in the eye of the beholder,seemingly.
Reality relativism where truth is subjective. |
|
|
| 12/19/16 5:51 PM |
| s c | | Oh | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Y in A, 
Bishop,just because Hillary lost,doesn't mean that the nation won.
...just a different kind of judgment.
Further,if Trump wants to fool someone into thinking that he supports evangelicals,he would benefit by not catering to the ecumenists,like Graham.
Of course,the true evangelicals don't have much to offer him according to worldly wisdom.We do,however,have all that matters ultimately to so direct him to Christ...Who offers benefits out of this world. |
|
|
| 12/18/16 12:32 PM |
| s c | | Oh | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
U S, I did not say "... (I) have little regard for those...
I said that I don't have little regard as in thinking upon them as less.
For those who say that "christmas" is not pagan...the spin on it doesn't negate that the RCC coined the word ...and basically the "holiday" (which is from saturnalia). It's their word (mass of christ) and they still hold it as such. It hasn't changed for them. Are we RC? If not, drop their word and tradition.
This kind of reasoning would allow for any pagan "holiday" to be "christianized"...why not try it with mardis gras too?
The depiction of what is,essentially,nude bodies,"stick",is porn. You must have a low opinion of God's word on it. It would only follow that you should have no problem with any image of people baring their bodies,including,sodomites based on your "observations" and I never said that what this guy did had anything to do with the RC. If he still uses their word,however,he is sounding RC no matter how he feels about it.
If we are against relative reality,then we need to quit embracing it without exception. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
