NCAC wrote:
....
Recent Supreme Court decisions have made clear, the right to free speech and expression can sometimes be subordinated when necessary to achieve legitimate educational goals. (See discussions of Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier and Bethel School District v. Fraser, in Fact Sheet #4.) A school is not comparable to a public park where anyone can stand on a soapbox, or a bulletin board on which anyone can post a notice. While students and teachers do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate” (Tinker v. Des Moines), speech is not quite as free inside educational institutions as outside....

https://tinyurl.com/y3fdgo6b

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Mississippi

Sarah John wrote:
Facing the gradual erosion of early leads in several battleground states — and increasingly likely defeat in the presidential election — the Trump campaign is launching a well-planned legal assault to challenge the validity of ballots and the process of vote-counting itself.

The Biden campaign is responding with an equally well-coordinated legal defence and a grassroots fundraising effort called the "Biden Fight Fund".

Once again, the courts will be called in to resolve a US presidential election, although it is unlikely any rulings will change the results significantly — unless the election comes down to extremely narrow margins in Pennsylvania or Georgia....

https://tinyurl.com/y4gmepqd

https://tinyurl.com/y53lxq2v

Christian Paz wrote:
....
Liberals may accuse these Latinos of voting against their own interests, given Trump’s mishandling of the pandemic, attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and restrictions on immigration—all issues that affect millions of Latino lives. But many pro-Trump Latinos told me they simply define their interests differently than their more progressive cousins do. They don’t necessarily feel solidarity with Latinos as a whole, and many identify themselves as American first. (Some reject “Latino” or “Latinx” labels as well.) Many are lifelong Republicans not eager to abandon their party, and Trump’s economy-first message and opposition to abortion rights resonate with them. Democrats shouldn’t be surprised if Trump matches or improves on his 2016 showing among Latinos, or if their votes help him hold battleground states. Republican Latinos have always existed, and the Trump campaign has dedicated significant resources to winning over more of the Hispanic community this election cycle....

https://tinyurl.com/y2fjuovf

Good article

And:

https://tinyurl.com/jko49r6 (Christians and Politics, Part 3)

John 18:36
Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world. ---ESV

https://tinyurl.com/y6fz22l8

ABC.net.au wrote:
"We are not enemies. What brings us together as Americans is so much stronger than anything that can tear us apart."

"But we have had hard campaigns before. We have faced hard times before. So, once this election is finalised and behind us, it will be time for us to do what we've always done as Americans," Mr Biden said in his prepared speech.

"To put the harsh rhetoric of the campaign behind us. To lower the temperature. To see each other again. To listen to each other again. To hear each other again. To respect and care for one another again.

"To unite. To heal. To come together as a nation.

"I know this won't be easy. I'm not naive. Neither of us are. I know how deep and hard the opposing views are in our country on so many things.

"But I know this as well: to make progress, we have to stop treating our opponents as enemies.

https://tinyurl.com/y3qqndr2

My my, Wisconsin has been called for Biden. Things are looking up, but I'm not holding my breath any.

John MacArthur's article on

"Charismatic Chaos"

https://tinyurl.com/jga4xcx

We should condemn attacks on all peaceful religions anyway ❗👎

You really should read the:

"The Inadequacy of Islam"

https://tinyurl.com/gn4kqok

Which I took to James L. Barton quotation from

I see my stab at Dominionism

https://tinyurl.com/y228feo8

has completely failed ❗👎

Casino gambling has been approved for Nebraska, an issue that has always failed before, and something I always voted for the failure of also.

John MacArthur wrote:
....
In the year 2000 I wrote a book called Why Government Can’t Save You. It could have been titled a lot of things; that’s the title the publisher picked: Why Government Can’t Save You. And what I tempted to say in that perhaps somewhat sarcastic title was, if you’re dealing with the issue of salvation, the government won’t help. What I was really trying to say and what I did say in the book was that for Christians the mandate is not about some kind of cultural morality, the mandate is about salvation, and the government plays no role....
....

http://tinyurl.com/yapvm8uy

Some Scripture for people who like to mix Christianity with Catholicism and or politics.

Mark 7:7-13

7. They worship me in vain, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’

8. “For you set aside the commandment of God, and hold tightly to the tradition of men—the washing of pitchers and cups, and you do many other such things.” 9. He said to them, “Full well do you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your tradition. 10. For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother;’ and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him be put to death.’ 11. But you say, ‘If a man tells his father or his mother, “Whatever profit you might have received from me is Corban,”’” that is to say, given to God, 12. “then you no longer allow him to do anything for his father or his mother, 13. making void the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down. You do many things like this.”

R. Moore wrote:
....
I think that’s one of the reasons why many of us (and I say us) are irked sometimes when we see the word “evangelical” being used in some really broad and often weird and sometimes even gospel-denying kinds of ways out there in the broader culture. A couple years ago, I wrote a piece in The Washington Post
https://tinyurl.com/jkzyxsn
that said that I find myself not using the word “evangelical” very often anymore and instead using “Gospel Christian” when people ask me about my religious affiliation and who I am. And the reason for that is because often now, when people in the larger world use the word “evangelical,” what they’re doing is talking about mostly simply a political category. They’re talking about white evangelicals, rarely talking about evangelicals of color, and they’re talking about a caricature of evangelicals, either that’s just kind of a voting bloc – a group of people that are just kind of like cicadas that go into dormancy between Iowa caucuses every four years, or evangelical in terms of the most buffoonish sorts of representatives of evangelicalism that might be out there on television or or on the internet....

Mike Gendron wrote:
....We propose that a Catholic Christian is indeed an oxymoron for two reasons:
1) whom we are is what we believe, and
2) it is impossible for anyone to believe two opposing views simultaneously.
We recognize that there may be some Christians attending the Catholic Church but if they have believed the Gospel they are no longer Catholics. Let us consider the contradictory beliefs of Catholics and Christians. By definition we will propose a Christian is one who believes the Gospel while a Catholic is one who believes the official teachings and traditions of his church (presented by paragraph number from the Catechism of the Catholic Church)....
....
These thirteen teachings and traditions of Roman Catholicism demonstrate that a Catholic Christian is indeed an oxymoron. They also affirm how man made traditions nullify the Word of God (Mark 7:7-13). There are many Evangelicals and Roman Catholics who are unaware of how diametrically opposed Catholic dogmas are to the Word of God...Evangelicals must be educated so they can proclaim the true gospel to Catholics instead of uniting with them under a compromised and diluted gospel....

"It is, however, fair and just to demand that of any religion, professing to be adequate to meet the needs of men, shall so reveal in its adherents a power for good in both individuals and in society that the only fair conclusion would be, that, if this religion should become general it would benefit mankind. Any religion that meets this test must pass as a good religion; but if it aspires to become a universal religion, it must show that it is capable of meeting the needs of humanity in all relationships more completely than any other religion can do. Islam claims to be not only a good religion but the best religion for the world, hence the necessity of showing that it is best suited to the conditions and needs of all men and in all of their varied relationships. Christianity is compelled meet the same tests as must any other religion. "...

J.L. Barton