Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
68

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -37 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ DARREN THOMAS ”
Page 1 | Page 2 ·  Found: 112 user comments posted recently.
News Item7/2/19 8:41 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Christopher000 wrote:
Like the Saints of Old, he had faith in the one who would come, and because of that, was basically already saved, so his deeds could be considered righteous by God(?)
Thanks for your response Christopher. My views on the issue are laid out in my posts of 6/30/19 12:23 PM and 6/30/19 4:30 PM. What you say is absolutely correct.

John weighed in on your use of the Isaiah passage and then imported his sentiments to the Cornelius case by insisting that unregenerate sinners can please God and he condemned those who say otherwise as misreading Isaiah 64 as though that was the only passage that addressed the issue. Doesn't it seem strange that as the conversation went on, suddenly he claimed to be open minded? John has a habit of holding to contradictory positions because he believes that the God of the Bible is illogical and can therefore hold to opposites as being true. I averted to this in my post 6/28/19 4:45 AM. It's also a neat device to get out of trouble because he can deny one or the other position, or insist on one or the other as suits him. How can he claim to believe in total depravity and yet also believe that the sinful enemies of God can do anything to please him? Its extraordinary mental gymnastics.


News Item7/2/19 7:14 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Hi Christopher

Forgive the intrusion, but from what I've witnessed so far, it seems to me that John UK is a practiced hand at deception and so to assist on the point of whether anything that an unregenerate person does is ever pleasing to God, please look at the well known Psalm 14:

1 ......They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

2 The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.

3 They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

Now bear in mind that Paul uses these verses in Roman 3. 10ff to prove what? Look at verse 9 and you will note that he sees these verses as proof that all unconverted Jews and Gentiles are sinners and that none seek after God, none understand, none do good, all are filthy and corrupt.

Wasn't this precisely the lament of the Isaiah passage?

It is incontrovertible that nothing that unconverted sinners do is ever spiritually good or pleasing to God. Don't let John UK beguile you into believing otherwise.

I hope you have a blessed day.


News Item7/1/19 11:52 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Mike wrote:
3. Command is meaningless if provision to obey isn't there.
Was Israel required to obey the law perfectly? Could they? If not, on what basis was there this requirement if there must always be the ability to meet the command?

Romans 7
10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.

11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

This is Paul writing as a believer. what hope for the unbeliever?


News Item7/1/19 9:01 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
That's okay bro. In the meantime, my friend Adam Clarke has something to say about the oh-so-common use of Isaiah 64:6.
[As filthy rags - עדים iddim. Rab. Mosheh ben Maimon interpretatur עדים iddim, vestes quibus mulier se abstergit post congressum cum marito suo. Alii pannus menstruatus. Alii panni mulieris parientis. - And we ben made as unclene alle we: and as the cloth of the woman rooten blode flowing, all our rigtwisnesses. - Old MS. Bible. If preachers knew properly the meaning of this word, would they make such a liberal use of it in their public ministry? And why should any use a word, the meaning of which he does not understand? How many in the congregation blush for the incautious man and his “filthy rags!”] Clarke
The source of your Arminianism no doubt.

Absurd comment. If it was an injudicious illustration for public use why would it be used by God at all? A great deal of fuss over nothing.


News Item7/1/19 8:15 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
So when in Isaiah 64 a godly person associates themselves with the sins of the majority of unbelievers comprising the nation, can we or can we not use the verse to identify the works of righteousness done by unbelievers are being filthy rags etc?

Yes, of course we can. Evangelicals have not been mistaken in using the verse as they have done, and there is no reason for anyone to feel guilty or apologize if they have done so. It is quite proper for the verse to be used in that way.

Now here's a lesson in logic: Even if somehow John UK managed to convince anyone here (contrary to the facts) that this is only spoken of the backslidden godly, then arguing from the greater to the lesser, we could say that if this can be said of the backslidden believers, how much more applicable is it to unbelievers!


News Item7/1/19 7:57 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Christopher000 wrote:
I never realized that it was the pleas, and laments of the backslidden:
Hi Christopher

Re: Isaiah 64 - don’t forget that the majority in Israel were always unbelievers but because of the national covenant the godly would nevertheless lament when the nation as a whole left off obeying God. Who is it that felt the national judgements of God most keenly? It was always the godly and they lamented when the ungodly did not. The ungodly only did so when the judgements were calamitous.

So for instance v7 none calleth upon they name would be an absurdity if it meant literally no one because the person lamenting is doing exactly that. So it doesn't mean literally no one, just by comparison they were so few.

As Paul points out in Romans 9, there was always a spiritual Israel within the national Israel, to whom all the promises of God were made good, but they were always a remnant.

Here we have a godly believer lamenting and including himself and all the other godly people with the ungodly in saying that all their righteousnesses are as filthy rags. This is by way of association because of the national covenant. He speaks as a representative.

....More coming


News Item6/30/19 5:36 PM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
But this is totally taking the text out of its context and making it say something it is not saying. It isn't even referring to the ungodly, but to God's own children.
Someone clearly has no clue about Romans 9

6......For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.

8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

I wonder why this man has so little spiritual understanding.


News Item6/30/19 4:30 PM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
...it seems to me that he was saved under Peter's preaching.
In the OT "salvation/redemption" was still a future event, and even those who were the spiritual children of Abraham waited for it. Recall how Simeon who was a just and devout man upon whom was the Holy Spirit upon taking the baby Jesus in his arms exclaimed "Lord...mine eyes have seen thy salvation", and how Anna the prophetess "spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem". Being "saved" is something specifically spoken of those that believe in Jesus, because he is Salvation. This does not mean that Cornelius was not already a justified believer. Just that when he came to believe in Jesus according to NT usage he is said to be saved.

News Item6/30/19 1:24 PM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
Once you get past that crevice, you can move on to:
1 John 2:29 KJV
(29)  If ye know that he is righteous, ye know that every one that doeth righteousness is born of him.
1 John 3:7 KJV
(7)  Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
And plenty of other texts.
I hope you are finding this helpful, despite the interruptions from hypercalviniums.
Isn't this the heresy of the wider hope being presented to us? viz. that all those that seem to do good works are righteous. Works righteousness will bring many who have never heard of Jesus to heaven.

If so, then the man is an out and out heretic.


News Item6/30/19 12:23 PM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
ladybug wrote:
Christopher is right, all our works are as filthy rags and can never please God prior to being regenerated.
The point about Cornelius which is lost on some is that he is already a Gentile proselyte to the Jewish religion. He feared the true God, having abandoned his former Roman idols.

He was in other words an OT gentile believer. So what was the point of Peter being sent to him with the Gospel? Exactly so that the Lord could demonstrate to Peter and the early church that the gospel is meant for the gentiles too: something that the early Jewish believers found very difficult to accept. And also to bring Cornelius into NT light; specifically to know of the life and death of the Savior and to receive the Holy Spirit. This is a case specific to the transition from the OT to the NT.

Given that he already believed in the true God why should his works, which were done in faith, not please God?

The works of all unbelievers are as filthy rags, even though John UK doesn't believe that any more. He seems to be attracted to all false teaching like a moth to a light.


News Item6/30/19 10:32 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Mike wrote:
If a good General issues a command, he does so with the understanding that it can be carried out by those under his command. If some fail in carrying out the command, it shows no weakness on his part. The weakness is in those who fail to carry out the command. This assumes the tools and weapons are given those expected to obey. If they are not provided, the command is emptied of the meaning and intent of "command."
If what you insist on be true then mankind has no need of any spiritual assistance to understand, repent or believe. Do you believe in prevenient grace? If so, why?

Also, if the determination of the matter lies with the sinner, what exactly do you pray that God will do for sinners? As far as you are concerned he has done all that is necessary and sits back now until someone responds. What can he possibly do to help any unconverted sinner?

Dr Tim, the verse doesn't mean what you think it does. Think who it is addressed to (see v13 for instance) and remember that the "ye" is not the people but the authorities, specifically the scribes and Pharisees who were preventing the people from coming to hear the Lord preach.


News Item6/30/19 9:37 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
"...let all the house of Israel know assuredly...."
If there was such a thing as telling untruths to the non elect, here Peter was doing it, if The Christ is only for the benefit of the remnant.
More strawmen! I could equally say to all sinners that God hath made Jesus Lord and Christ without a lie, because it is true. I too can issue the command that all should repent and believe and that those who do with sincerity will be forgiven, and receive the Holy Spirit. Again this would be a true statement. Where did Peter say he died for every single Jew and Gentile, which would have been a lie because Christ only secured blessings for those who repent and believe. Add to this that he is the one that grants the repentance and the faith, which he secured by his own death, then your universal atonement is in shreds.

I wonder why you are going to such great lengths to confuse issues.


News Item6/30/19 9:07 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
.... the message is for all the house of Israel .
Acts 17:30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent

No one here has denied that the command goes out to all creatures. But of course you know that that is not the issue. Part of holding on to a false gospel is that you have to confuse issues and raise up straw men to knock down so that it makes you look very clever.

The issue is whether Christ died for everyone, and if he did then he redeemed every single soul he died for, in which case the command is meaningless because he secured the salvation of all that he died for. If you deny that he secured the salvation of anyone in particular, then he only made salvation possible and one has to redeem oneself by trusting in his death. If this is the case then the difference is in what you did as opposed to those who rejected it, which makes you very clever. Only the dumb ones end up in hell. How is this any different to arminianism?

Even in your post you restrict the blessings to those who repent and believe. Why, if he died for everyone? Is unbelief the only sin not atoned for?

Who maketh thee to differ? Your answer, along with all of arminianism is "I do".


News Item6/28/19 1:07 PM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
..he can't do that in case that sinner is reprobate and he doesn't want to give a hellbound sinner a false hope, especially in the matter of God's love, which he cannot tell him about in a personal way, in case God doesn't love him
NEWS ALERT!!

Gospel according to John UK - "God only blesses lying evangelists"!!

Why not accept decisionism as well? Like Graham, why not tell those who "decide" for Christ that they really are saved? Better still, go the whole hog and send your converts to Roman Catholic churches, because God doesn't care for truth any more. Graham's and Robert Schuller's wider hope message is where you will end up given just a few more months of changing doctrinal winds. All that matters is 1) how much one can gush over a made up Jesus, as long as there is some tenuous link to the Jesus of the Bible and 2) a requirement to become a gushing ambassador for the new popular failure of an idol to the hell bound.


News Item6/28/19 7:00 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
...nor demanding that others "hold the same as myself or I will call them unregenerate"
I must be the exception then, or is it a case of hypocrisy that slipped the mind?

News Item6/28/19 5:18 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
John UK wrote:
... Spurgeon said, his blood was sufficient to save 10,000 worlds full of sinners, should God have so decided.
Where is the scripture which teaches that his blood is sufficient to save 10,000 worlds full of sinners?

Also, if the infinite preciousness of the blood was the crucial factor, just one drop would have sufficed.

"Should God decide"?! - Ah, a caveat. Did he so decide? If not, what's the point of believing this nonsense which isn't even scriptural?

I could equally say that his blood could have saved all the fallen angels should God have so decided. How does that affect the salvation of the fallen angels? Does my saying so, ever so vehemently, create a gospel for fallen angels?

Is hope created by fiction better than that created by truth?

Is the Spirit suddenly going to draw into the kingdom more than just the elect because you preached this fiction?


News Item6/28/19 4:45 AM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
B. McCausland wrote:
1. These men focussed in the free offer of the gospel ...avoid ...contention.
2. Please it is never safe to interact with an individual mis...creating new straw men out of assumptions.
1. None here, as far as I am aware, has denied that the gospel should be preached to every creature. This is a straw man of your creation. Silly queries? When they go to the heart of the question, "what is the gospel?", and when they are already answered in the scriptures? Let me translate that, you don't want to hear what the bible actually has to say on the matter. Understood.

2. Convenient way of back tracking on your previous claims. You don't believe that Christ died for any specific people, despite what the scriptures teach, and are now making out that this is somehow me creating a straw man and making assumptions. Yes, please refrain from further dialogue because I have no sense that honesty matters to you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

John UK's ability to speak from both sides of his mouth never ceases to amaze me. He believes in total depravity but he doesn't, he believes in unconditional election but he doesn't, he believes that Christ died for everyone but he doesn't, he believes that people are irresistibly drawn but he doesn't etc.


News Item6/27/19 2:15 PM
Darren Thomas  Contact via emailFind all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
Come unto me, ALL ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
All all all all all ALL!!!!!!!!!
Here we witness a basic failure in comprehension. The all is NOT every single individual in the world, but specifically the ALL refers to those who labour and are heavy laden. It is only such who are promised rest if they come to the Lord.

This means that there are at least 3 categories in view here:

1. Those who are not labouring or heavy laden
2. Those who labour and are heavy laden but will not come, and
3. Those who labour and are heavy laden and will come.

But yeah, all means ALL. How silly! This is a foolish sacrifice of the ordinary rules of language to support their false gospel of an impotent "christ" who fails to save those that he died for. Notice too how little they account for the plainest verses which I posted up in 3 separate posts. The level of unbelief and idol making to support their fictitious gospel is mind blowing.

All the promises of the gospel are conditioned on coming in repentance and faith. None other will ever receive any of the blessings because Christ did not secure any for them.


News Item6/27/19 12:00 PM
Darren Thomas  Find all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Matt 13

38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one

Children of the wicked one?

Romans 9

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

Fitted to destruction? Afore prepared unto glory?

Words of God himself


News Item6/27/19 11:37 AM
Darren Thomas  Find all comments by Darren Thomas
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
267
comments
Matt 25

31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:

32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

Words of God himself

Jump to Page : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6



Jim Byrd
Two Trees

Genesis 2:9
Sunday Service
13th Street Baptist Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS


Tech Talk Zoom // Episode 05

Robert Gianserra
The Reign of the Son of Man..

The Prophecy of Daniel
Grace and Truth Church
Play! | MP3

Dr. Andrew Woods
James 012-Faith Without Works?

James
Sugar Land Bible Church
Video!Play! | MP4

Sponsor:
Learn How to Be a Church Consultant

Free Web­inar Replay with Thom Rain­er. 7 Habits of Succ­essful Church Cons­ult­ants.
https://event.webinarjam.co..

Sermon:
The Spirit Gives Life
Ron Lewis

SPONSOR




SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
2-MINUTE TIPS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards | Biz Cards
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

TECH TALK
Tech Talk Zoom // Episode 05
Copyright © 2021 SermonAudio.