Now Kristie Huggs is not a prophet, certainly not saying she is. But her role and our role is akin to Jeremiah's or maybe Ezekiel's. If we see someone busy killing themselves - quickly, slowly, or eternally - we're on the hook to say something or that person's blood is on our hands.

Whether or not the words are received graciously has no bearing on our responsibility. Otherwise, we find ourselves trying to be God and work out the outcome we feel is appropriate..,but only the Lord is sovereign. It could be that our words will be further evidence at that White Throne judgment for those who did not turn.

After I came to saving faith within a Bible teaching and preaching church, it wasn't too many months later when the annual remembrance of the Roe v Wade decision was mourned. How many church goers still hear the truth?

In NC, it has become the liberal Pedimont region at the center. Every school teacher is a state employee. Other states have their own issues.

I think a big part of the agenda is redefining terms and practices to something in line with the "social justice movement." This has been happening in education and academia for quite some time, perhaps unbeknownst to those of us without children "in the system." Ken Ham co-wrote a book about the impact of teaching evolution as established fact rather than one worldview to which other worldviews are in disagreement. This statement from the Clintons is essentially, IMO, just fruit from a different branch of the poisonous tree. Children have been taught that "any love is good love, so I took what I could get" since the early 1970s, following on the "free love" concept from the 1960s. That has morphed today into the LGBT+ movement, and those like Mrs. Clinton argue that Biblical sexual mores be abandoned (her husband also argued for this, but in a different way) as they have been arguing for 50+ years. To do otherwise than what they demand is "judgmental." It is also essentially the argument of a notable poster...how dare we suggest our morals be universally applied as if the Lord is only the Lord of the church and not the whole earth and universe?

Do we as a global population feel like we have the answers to much of anything? Clearly we know something or our consumer technology wouldn't be so available. But are we as smart as we think we are? I don't think so. Yet we are told that science knows best.

As Christians, we need to look for sources of absolute truth, which are becoming few and far between right now in a world that only forwards relative truth.

Wayfarer pilgrim wrote:
There is an article on the lefts unhealthy view of Judge Barrett children is more troubling. The left has judged Judge Barrett because she and her family sought to adopt children from a Haitian orphanage. Over 200,000 people were killed in an earthquake in 200,000 in 2010. Let that number sink in. The left and pseudo progressive evangelicals have a problem with adoption because they believe that no unwanted child should ever leave a womb , alive.

COVID has been a boon to the Left in helping to create class and racial tension as well as tighter government control. So she's right about that at least.

At some point after every crisis, there is a reckoning for those decisions made in the "heat of the moment" (term used loosely as it's hard to say some weren't premeditated). Already in Michigan, the decrees of the governor are being struck down. Similar has happened in other states.

What I want to point to is the concept that "we benefit from our communities of faith during these challenging times." That is not the primary reason we gather to worship - what we get out of it, even if those things we take away are good things as God defines good.

Who is more moral, Hillary or the President, is based more on your standards of what is or isn't moral might be. It's all in the definition. Knowing what I know about them both, I disagree with your assertion but am coming from more of a Christian/Biblical worldview. From the secular humanist worldview that you tend to forward, couldn't say. But I also disagree with the tenents of that worldview.