TMC wrote:
I think the point here is being missed. What happened was wrong, no matter what anyone was wearing. This could just as easily happened in the shower house at a campground, where women were dressing into perfectly modest clothing. If we wait until we agree with absolutely every aspect of a case to complain, we will be far too late.
First they came for a County Clerk-
But I said nothing because her denomination was wrong.
Then they came for the Church of Christ Duck Commander-
But I said nothing because the C of C's are heretics.
Then they came for Swimsuit wearing women-
But I said nothing because Swimsuits are wrong.
Finally they came for me-
And the precedent was already set with no one left to speak.

Just want you to know wrote:
it did not go unnoticed that you gave a very gracious reply to such a toxic response, thanks be to God for your kind and thoughtful reply.
I Thessalonians 1:3
Remembering without ceasing your work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, in the sight of God and our Father;

s c wrote:
Not that you would misjudge,of course,Carol who is against haranguing "... what you and some others post is nothing more than a continual haranguing."
Any one actually want to address the post or are you all such avid pro sports fans that you are blind-sided?
Talk about idols!
I have to ask you Carol,if you're married,does it please you that your husband and children would look at such immodesty and carnality?
Do you think that are unfazed?
What about the children in this country that are bombarded ad nauseum with this junk? Don't you care? Are you a Christian?
Children shouldn't even know who Beyounce is.

pennned wrote:
there was no footnote.
just says "virgin" and in all caps to reference the original which was Isaiah. really don't want to go in circles on this. Good day to all.