George Floyd was killed in a Democrat-controlled city. Almost all of the rioting has taken place in Democrat-controlled cities. If they vote at all, nearly one hundred percent of the rioters and looters vote Democrat. Jimâs solution? Elect another weak, morally corrupt goofball of a Democrat to be president. The nation is aflame with wickedness. The Democratsâ way to extinguish the fire is to douse it with gasoline. Another brilliant post, Jiminy Clickit.
Remember those internment camps used during World War II? Now would be a great time to reopen them as holding tanks for all the violent criminals who are caught attacking police officers and vandalizing and destroying property. A couple of years of pre-trial confinement in an Arizona tent city might go a long way toward helping them see the error of their ways.
Minnesota officials have blamed white supremacists for the riots in Minneapolis. These racist masters of mayhem must be smarter than the average white supremacist, as they are cleverly disguising themselves as black people while burning buildings and looting stores. All right-thinking Democrats should agree that this is a great opportunity to cut down on the scourge of the white supremacy movement by putting a shoot-to-kill order in effect during the riots across America.
You want to see a liar, John? Then you neednât look in my direction, for âThou art the man.â Furthermore, you presume to attempt show others the way to live when your own life, characterized by your frequent railings and your pompous pontificating, are no more representative of the mind of Christ than Peterâs denial of Him after Gethsemane. You say you welcome rebuke, but when you receive it you invariably deflect the attention back to the other party and say, in essence, âIâm fine. My attitude is fine. My bullying of others is fine. My whole life, being and outlook are fine, fine, fine.â Now John go ahead with your juvenile way of saying, âI know you are, but what am I?â As for me, until you repent of your wickedness, my treatment of you will be in accordance with Romans 16:17, âNow I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.â I invited you to repent, you steadfastly refuse, so adios, outlaw. You may fire at will, Gridley, and demonstrate what a fine ensample to the flock you are.
â...Why do you get your hackles up and become defensive and try to deflect the attention to others every time you receive criticism or even when someone disagrees with you?â More deflection, John. True to form, as always. So which was itâsarcasm, or outright lying, when you invited us to rebuke you and urge you to repent? Clearly you were not being sincere. Subtil as the serpent are you.
John UK wrote: âBTW folks, I don't know how you expect me to grow if you keep patting me on the head and being nice. I far prefer to be rebuked and exhorted, told to repent of my sins, to cast off my besetting sins, to strive after holiness by God's grace, and many other such things which are most biblical and necessary. Thank you.â John, one of the following is true: 1. You are being sarcastic, knowing full well that you actually despise being rebuked. 2. You are simply lying to make yourself appear âspiritual.â 3. You really meant what you said. If this is the case, then why do you get your hackles up and become defensive and try to deflect the attention to others every time you receive criticism or even when someone disagrees with you? If you were really the humble, self-effacing servant you make yourself out to be, donât you think that occasionally you would admit that you are wrong and the other person is right? IOW, John, I am accepting your invitation to rebuke you and urge you to repent of your besetting sin of deep-seated pride. We will soon see if you meant what you said, or if your words were completely empty.
The Quiet Christian wrote: âDr. Tim has apparently gotten so annoyed that he is responding as the Lord did when responding to Satan...using only Scripture.â As exasperating as Mr. Lincoln can be, QC, he is not the reason I have refrained from commenting on the articles on SA. Instead, it is because of persistent false accusations by two other people on this forum.